Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2016 NBA Draft Thread


HeatCheck

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Also, I think people don't really understand the NBA, especially on this board.  The NBA is the opposite of the NFL.  I've heard it explained before that in the NFL what makes you a winner is the supporting cast...  if you have 3-5 elite players, it's the other 48-50 guys that make the difference between being a perennial contender and being 8-8.  In the NBA, you can have 15 really good players, but unless you have 1 or 2 elite, all-nba players, you aren't going to win big.  You need the individual stars in this league to win.  The teams that are winning now did it with draft picks and supplementary FA signings or trades.  But, their homegrown talent is the core.  Historically, signing or trading for a star from another team (outside of the two recent "big threes") doesn't work, and even if it did, we can't even lure guys that are from here to come here, so unless we actually use our draft picks and draft well, we'll keep being what we've been.

On phone so can't quote both posts but I'll start by saying I 100% agree Dwight isn't really the answer but he is a name people know so he will likely get brought in. Not sure who else we could reasonably get unless we pull of a deal for Cousins then sign KD, but honestly if we get Cousins bringing Batum back and pairing him with Cousins, Kemba and MKG would be good enough.

As to the other point about needing a true superstar I agree to a point. The pistons showed you can have a team of good but not great players and get there and win it, it's just really hard to do. If Kemba, MKG and Frank keep progressing combined with Batum being Batum and us finding a competent rim protector while still having a solid bench I could see us going that route because I doubt we luck into a top 5 player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'd also be hesitant because he is not a winner and is quite a crybaby.  He is a harbinger of dysfunction as well lol.  

the Kings are a losing, dysfunctional franchise, that's with or without cousins they're a terrible franchise overall. And if you were the best big in the game and had to deal with the poo that the kings do, publicly chastising you as well as continuing to draft centers to be backups to you rather than surround you with talent that will contribute in a starting lineup, would you not be dissatisfied and have some complaints also?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MichaelNewtonII said:
On Friday, June 24, 2016 at 0:24 AM, Proudiddy said:
i'd also be hesitant because he is not a winner and is quite a crybaby.  He is a harbinger of dysfunction as well lol.  

 

the Kings are a losing, dysfunctional franchise, that's with or without cousins they're a terrible franchise overall. And if you were the best big in the game and had to deal with the poo that the kings do, publicly chastising you as well as continuing to draft centers to be backups to you rather than surround you with talent that will contribute in a starting lineup, would you not be dissatisfied and have some complaints also?

I always tend to look at things from yhe player's perspective, first.  That being said, there have been tons of former players who have criticized Cousins for his behavior, which tells me he is contributing quite a bit to the overall dysfunction of their organization.

And, from everything I've heard and read, especially since the new ownership took over there, they have done everything in their power to pamper and pacify Boogie as well, which only further exacerbates the problems already present.  So, I don't think a change of scenery suddenly makes him a winner.  He is supremely talented, but his attitude will weigh on and influence whatever team he is on.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
    • Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
×
×
  • Create New...