Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alright, post your All-Time Top 10 now that Bron won his third. 3/7


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

You have your opinion, I have mine. We'll see what the consensus is at the end of LeBrons career, he's only 31 people seem to forget

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 without a consistent jumper=trouble.  Especially when father time catches up with him.  You talk to me when your boy gets at least 5 rings, then we can have a conversation.  Until then, LeBron is Top 10, maybe Top 5, but that's as far as it goes.  

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year. No one in the east is even close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MichaelNewtonII said:

We'll talk again about this in 2-3 years. Kyrie is only gonna get better too and Love will be gone and replaced with a better fit. If LeBron has a good team around him he's going to continue to go to the finals every year

Agreed, because the East is hot garbage.  

Unless Durant comes over to the East, or another Superstar emerges, I won't argue with your statement.  

But, lookout for OKC, if they stay healthy, LeBron and Kyrie would have massive issues with Durant and Westbrook.  

Unlike GS, they also have big men that aren't completely useless.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Omega Atrocity said:

Comparing all time is really pointless, the NBA ebbs and flows. MJ would be a different player (skillset) if he played in today's league just like Steph Curry would be a different player in the 90s. 

In all honesty the league was very watered down up until about the 2000s as well, the average NBA player is leagues better than they were even in the 90s.

Yeah, watered down.  Lets see, how many certified Hall of Famers are in the League now?  Hmmmm, 1 maybe 2-3?  

And then we look at Jordans era in the 90's which was full of Hall of Famers, but yes, the league was watered down then.

You cannot make this poo up.  How old are these fuging kids?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...