Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lin be opting out and poo, bruhs.


Recommended Posts

Sarcastic-No-Way-Kristen-Wiig-Reaction-G

 

We all knew this was coming.. but still needs to be reported i guess..

 

He will be #2 or #3 on our FA list behind Batum (which I'm hearing will get done as soon as FA opens) and possible our hole at the Center position.. If we can sign Batum, then quickly get Lin back and still have enough for a max player - you can bet we getting a rebounding/shot blocking center

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

If we can sign Batum, then quickly get Lin back and still have enough for a max player - you can bet we getting a rebounding/shot blocking center

This would be best case scenario for sure. To resign Lin and Batum and a Howard/Whiteside type might put us in the ECF. Especially if MKG can stay healthy. Now if we could draft someone who isn't a PF...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

We would have to waive bu-bye the Courtney Lee for sure - Marvin might come back on the hometown discount, maybe.. but if we were able to get Batum, Lin and Howard - there ain't no "Might be in the ECF" = We in there for sure!

Bruh, we be in there like swimwear.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the way he played and the expected jump in salary cap, it makes no sense for him to opt in. I don't think this means he doesn't want back but knows his market value. He truly deserves more than $2.2 million.

To be honest, I would like to keep Batum and Marvin and draft a PG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/8/2016 at 7:25 AM, pantherfan49 said:

It is absolutely crucial that Lin is re-signed. He covers up for some ball movement deficiencies of the 1st and 2nd string units. 

Depends on what he's demanding.  He could probably get 7.5 to 8 million per year on the market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...