Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SO why didn't we kick the field goal?


Zod

Recommended Posts

It would have been stupid to go for 3. It isn't like we stopped them all the second half or didn't let them take out a kickoff to at least the 40.

What is stupid is that week after week this site runs incredibly slow and no one does anything about it even with pared down functions on game day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you serious? Even if we kick the field goal you would still end up in a haily mary situation. If we did kick the field goal you'd probably be pissed that we didn't go for it. Our 3rd down defense is to blame for today's loss.

yes, defense let us down today and special teams too. thought the call to go for it was a good one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We still would have needed a TD, our D never proved they could stop them in a short amount of time.

I agree with the call to go for it

I agree with the we still needed a TD anyway. By going for it you give your offense two chances at a TD. What bugged me about that drive is on 3rd down you already know you are going for it on 4th so why not try to pick up so yards on a short pass so its not a 4th and 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, its a difficult decision. Which is harder, converting 4th and 10, or relying on a suspect defense to stop Atlanta?

Can't really fault the coach for the choice he made in that instance.

We lost the game in several areas though, and the number one area was our complete inability to stop the pass. Ryan shredded us with ease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take the sure 3 (don't have to worry later about a 2 point conversion to tie...a tie not good on the road). The Falcons would be ahead, so would not be too aggressive on O. Better chance for our D to stop them then if we scored...they would have marched down the field with the time left. Strategy says...better off with the 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have kicked the field goal. Why?

1) We would need a stop anyway to get the ball back to win it

2) I would not want to rely on a 2-point conversion, which we may or may not have gotten

3) We had plenty of time on the clock for a defensive stop with the 2-minute warning and 3 timeouts

4) The last possession, with a stop, would have been for the win, not a tie

I realize had we kicked it and lost by 5, everyone would be mad that Fox went conservative. But, that's hindsight for you. Yeah, the defense was horrible today, but they still would need a stop for us to get the ball back to have a chance. That's a risk that needed to be taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I said less than 10 minutes into the game, Boston looks nothing like we're used to seeing. Regardless, any curb-stomping of the Bruins is welcome.  The scorers all got the glory tonight, but all 6 D-men had excellent games. Across the board- Gost, Orlov, Chatty, Walker and, of course, Slavin & Burns.
    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
×
×
  • Create New...