Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hedging your bets, a lesson in drafting success.


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

So, I'm seeing a lot of people on here acting with the Butler pick is a slam dunk draft pick just because Dave Gentleman drafted him, honestly I think it was the single most questionable pick of our entire draft.

Here is the big secret about the draft,  it's completely luck at times, especially when you draft as late as we did this year (30-31).  Not every draft is a 2001, or a 2014 draft class, that's why those years are special, because they are rare. Usually in any given draft there is about 15-20 day 1 starting level talents in a draft class, the rest require some level of development. Meaning, anything from 20 on is a maybe and to just goes down from there the further the draft goes on.  This is also why the Panthers drafted 3 CB's in this draft. and why drafting all those CB's is the best part of our draft this year hands down. Gettleman knows all 3 will not workout long term, he drafted 3 CB's because odds are maybe one of them will workout. and if by some miracle 2 work out? Jackpot!

Gettleman knows how to hedge bets on players development, and that's why he's been cleaning house with everyone else since coming to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Butler's floor is valuable defensive line depth. His ceiling is KK Short. Not a bad pick at 30.

I made a similar point about the CBs. With the coaches Carolina has, there's reason to believe the Panthers just solidified the cornerback position for the next five years or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing for sure is that these young DBs will push each other. 

I love the Butler pick. I think he will be a monster. I can see the logic questioning the position but not the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The part about the 3 corners is exactly what I was saying this morning. If Gettleman drafts 3 corners, I am sure one of them will work out. What if one becomes as good as Norman and the other one is a serviceable nickel corner? That is a jackpot. Add in Butler that can rush the QB to rotate with KK and Star, wow! G-man is the godfather for a reason. Other people can doubt what he is doing, but I'm not going to. He has forgotten more about football than 90% of what people know on this message board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Butler's floor is valuable defensive line depth. His ceiling is KK Short. Not a bad pick at 30.

I made a similar point about the CBs. With the coaches Carolina has, there's reason to believe the Panthers just solidified the cornerback position for the next five years or so.

DG's post draft presser kinda cemented this idea. He basically decides to see which position group is in the most dire need, and then attacks it to fix it, often times with guys who will grow together.

First it was DT/DL (Stah, KK, Ealy), then WR (KB, Philly, Funch), and now the new CBs. The OL could be next depending on how those contracts play out over the next year or two. Plus, it helped getting a beast in Trai and lucky with Norwell/Oher/Remmers to help push the OL needs down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point about a weak draft.  With the influx of underclassmen the past few years, after the top 20ish (or less) picks, 25=50, and there's not a HUGE difference between 50 and 100...

So the lesson from Gettleman is that you get the best guys you can, no matter where they are drafted.  It's better to lose picks and get the best guys for your team instead of just some dudes that are arbitrarily considered better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

Puts things in perspective. Imo this was a weak draft class, and Dave Gettleman is increasing his odds of finding someone who can play in the backfield. Good eye-opener.

I've read that this is actually one of the deepest draft classes in years. 

  • Schneider said of the seven draft classes he's seen since becoming Seattle's general manager in 2010, this one is "the most impressive one so far in terms of the sheer numbers of players." Schneider previously said that Seattle will have 200 players on its draft board compared to 130 or 140 in other years. He reiterated that there don't seem to be as many "drop-offs" as there are in other years, meaning not as many large gaps in talent between groups of players at a certain position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see questioning the pick in terms of drafting yet another DT,  but Getty's track record with first rounders has been a pretty good one,  so of course there is really no reason to think that Butler won't be good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 Meaning, anything from 20 on is a maybe and to just goes down from there the further the draft goes on.  This is also why the Panthers drafted 3 CB's in this draft. and why drafting all those CB's is the best part of our draft this year hands down. Gettleman knows all 3 will not workout long term, he drafted 3 CB's because odds are maybe one of them will workout. and if by some miracle 2 work out? Jackpot!

 

The exact same logic could be used for the Butler pick you just questioned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Newtcase said:

I've been saying Cleveland should draft 7+ QB's for years.

Teams still care too much about how things "look". If I don't have a quarterback I'm drafting three every year til I do. Early pick, mid rounder, late rounder. Every year.

I figured by year 3, Quarterback 9, I would have found my franchise guy.

Meanwhile the Browns have been looking for a QB for a decade and a half. They draft Brandon freakin Weeden and think for some reason that they've fixed the problem smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jesse said:

I've read that this is actually one of the deepest draft classes in years. 

  • Schneider said of the seven draft classes he's seen since becoming Seattle's general manager in 2010, this one is "the most impressive one so far in terms of the sheer numbers of players." Schneider previously said that Seattle will have 200 players on its draft board compared to 130 or 140 in other years. He reiterated that there don't seem to be as many "drop-offs" as there are in other years, meaning not as many large gaps in talent between groups of players at a certain position.

I'm talking about pure stand out talent type draft. No eye-popping wide receivers, QB's, or defensive players, but a lot of really consistent talent across the board. You won't get the talent of the century from this draft imo, maybe someone on the defensive side. But you will get good consistent players across the board, I agree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...