Garrett > Funchess?

[dldove77]

I've watched Garrett's highlights for last season and the game against Oklahoma. Am I crazy, or does he look like a better long term prospect than Funchess? Funchess is a great guy and made progress last year, but I don't know if he's a legit number two. 

I see good hands, good speed, burner catches, sideline catches, catches in traffic. Just don't know about the route running...need to look a little deeper. 

Am I crazy? 

 

[csx]

We will find out.

[Jon Snow]

Yeah, you're getting way ahead of yourself with the Garrett love.  Time will tell if he even makes the team let alone beats Fun Fun out of his spot.  Cool your jets a tad.

[CarolinaNut]

good lord..smh

[dldove77]

Thanks for the feedback!

[dpanther69]

If so it is a good problem to have.

[Doyle]

They are already erecting a statue outside of BOA based on his college game tape. 

[bLACKpANTHER]

i don't know anything, but Gman had a 1st Rnd grade on Funch.. he let Garrett slide undrafted for some reason.. my bet is it was for a good reason

[Nick_81]

3 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

I've watched Garrett's highlights for last season and the game against Oklahoma. Am I crazy, or does he look like a better long term prospect than Funchess? Funchess is a great guy and made progress last year, but I don't know if he's a legit number two. 

I see good hands, good speed, burner catches, sideline catches, catches in traffic. Just don't know about the route running...need to look a little deeper. 

Am I crazy? 

 

For using highlight videos, as a basis for determining whether or not a rookie WR, is a better prospect than someone who's already on the team?  Naaahhhh

[Bartin]

Keep in mind Funchess is like 2 years younger than Garrett when comparing.

[Jeremy Igo]

3 hours ago, Bartin said:

Keep in mind Funchess is like 2 years younger than Garrett when comparing.

and a dozen years less playing football. 

[blackcat]

We'll find out, but pay close attention to the score as you're watching those highlights.  

[top dawg]

Funchess looks more athletic to me. He also appears to have more dawg in him. But of course that doesn't mean that he will ultimately be the better receiver.  If Garrett wants to be better,  he is going to have to put in the time and effort with the coaches,  playbook,  and show it on the field. For now, he is a limited route runner just trying to prove that he belongs in the pros. 

[csx]

As they are both on our team I am not too concerned with who is better. As long as they are both productive we win.