Panthers press conference after Bradberry & Worley picks

[Fox007]

26 minutes ago, USCGuardsman said:

I think its more about him just being tired of having to validate his plan or decisions to the media. They always bust his balls because of the BPA approach in the first, but that's exactly what should be done in the first. Notice that Dave doesn't buy into who the media or so called analyst say he should pick and he has been dead right all but one time so far. I have come to the conclusion that the "experts" have no idea what we need, but Dave does.

Well the media in general is pretty ignorant, stupid, and annoying. But the Charlotte media...they take it to another level of derp and what was that word another poster used? goober? yea they have a bunch of goobers askin dipshit ass questions.

[TheSpecialJuan]

Excellent. thank you

[Gin and Juice]

Nice, Bradbury and Worley were in their top 6 of CBs in the draft!

Both had 2nd Rd grades.....Bene had a 3rd Rd grade. Let that sink in

[Norway]

21 minutes ago, Gin and Juice said:

Nice, Bradbury and Worley were in their top 6 of CBs in the draft!

Not the way I interpreted it. When he mentioned that they were the highest CB on their board after the four were picked, I believe he referres to the four CBs picked in the second round before Panthers picked Bradberry in the second. The presser was after round 2-3, and since they reset their board after the first round this would make sence. 

It was five CBs picked in the first as well, so Bradberry & Worley were propable ranked around the 10th CBs on their board the way I see it. 

[Gin and Juice]

11 minutes ago, Norway said:

Not the way I interpreted it. When he mentioned that they were the highest CB on their board after the four were picked, I believe he referres to the four CBs picked in the second round before Panthers picked Bradberry in the second. The presser was after round 2-3, and since they reset their board after the first round this would make sence. 

It was five CBs picked in the first as well, so Bradberry & Worley were propable ranked around the 10th CBs on their board the way I see it. 

Possible....I took it as face value meaning 3-4 in all ahead of them. He talked about feeling Bradbury would drop based on small school stigma due to the question of trading up to grab him

[Norway]

6 minutes ago, Gin and Juice said:

Possible....I took it as face value meaning 3-4 in all ahead of them. He talked about feeling Bradbury would drop based on small school stigma due to the question of trading up to grab him

I know, you can see it both ways. The first way you see it will propable stick with you. With regard to him feeling Bradberry would fall to pick 62, it could have been that he felt it wasn't necessary to trade up in the second to get one of the four corners that went before in the second (and was higher rated), because he was comfortable that at least Bradberry would be there at 62

[Gin and Juice]

10 minutes ago, Norway said:

I know, you can see it both ways. The first way you see it will propable stick with you. With regard to him feeling Bradberry would fall to pick 62, it could have been that he felt it wasn't necessary to trade up in the second to get one of the four corners that went before in the second (and was higher rated), because he was comfortable that at least Bradberry would be there at 62

Bradbury was 5th corner off the board at 31 in the 2nd. 4th corner went at 29.

Would have been no need to think about trade up. Also, don't see the other 4 CBs in 2nd being on Panthers radar, maybe one of them, possibly two at most

[Shocker]

Gettlemen has forgot more than I'll ever know...we had to get CBs.  Gotta believe he got good ones.

[Ja Rhule]

Lol at they both have balls

[captfluoro]

I like his comment, "It's gambling, we make educated guesses."  I don't know why but that stuck with me.  It sounds honest and even a little humble. 

[Norway]

3 minutes ago, Gin and Juice said:

Would have been no need to think about trade up. Also, don't see the other 4 CBs in 2nd being on Panthers radar, maybe one of them, possibly two at most

Yeah, thats what I said. No need to trade when they were comfortable that at least Bradberry would be there at 62. The cost to trade up was to great compared to how much higher they rated the other 4.  But all that matters now are that they both are panthers, no matter where they were graded at the board. Hopefulle both of them should have been on the top of the board, two years from now

[Mr. Scot]

5 minutes ago, captfluoro said:

I like his comment, "It's gambling, we make educated guesses."  I don't know why but that stuck with me.  It sounds honest and even a little humble. 

Honestly, every pick from #1 to Mr Irrelevant is an educated guess.

[Mr. Scot]

14 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Gettlemen has forgot more than I'll ever know...we had to get CBs.  Gotta believe he got good ones.

So you're now over the earlier complaints?

[Shocker]

Yeah they are Panthers now so gotta back em.