On second thought...we should have paid Norman

[RoaringRiot]

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Nope can't blame him when he wanted to resign with the team the second he was cut.

 

Not only that but they had until June to reach a deal, so cutting him just cause you couldn't reach an agreement 2 month before the deadline is asinine.

 

 

you would feel better if they kept him until July even if they knew there was a 0% chance of reaching an agreement? Why?

[Castavar]

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Nope can't blame him when he wanted to resign with the team the second he was cut.

 

Not only that but they had until June to reach a deal, so cutting him just cause you couldn't reach an agreement 2 month before the deadline is asinine.

 

 

Yes, you can blame him AND his agent for fuggin it up. If he REALLY wanted to play here one more year, all he had to do was sign it instead of milking it out. And NEWSFLASH, there is no way in hell we were going to sign Norman to that mega contract. So it was either sign the tag or GTFO.

[GoobyPls]

Just now, Castavar said:

Yes, you can blame him AND his agent for fuggin it up. If he REALLY wanted to play here one more year, all he had to do was sign it instead of milking it out.

Every player milks it out, it's part of the protocol.

The difference is level headed GM's usually know not to cut players cause you couldn't reach a deal in mid fugging April.

 

Your one of his blind defenders, I can already tell

[GoobyPls]

4 minutes ago, RoaringRiot said:

you would feel better if they kept him until July even if they knew there was a 0% chance of reaching an agreement? Why?

Yes, cause I know he would have signed the tender and played at least one more season.

 

You think Norman was gonna sit out games? LOL

[Castavar]

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Every player milks it out, it's part of the protocol.

The difference is level headed GM's usually know not to cut players cause you couldn't reach a deal in mid fugging April.

 

Your one of his blind defenders, I can already tell

And you're one of those people that look at everything negatively. Your last 12 posts literally have NOTHING positive to say about anything. Find some happiness.

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

Yes, cause I know he would have signed the tender and played at least one more season.

 

You think Norman was gonna sit out games? LOL

You know this how?  Are you his agent?

[GoobyPls]

Just now, Castavar said:

And you're one of those people that look at everything negatively. Your last 12 posts literally have NOTHING positive to say about anything. Find some happiness.

Changing the subject? LOL

I find happiness the second you come out from under Gettleman table. 

[coralreefer_1]

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Every player milks it out, it's part of the protocol.

The difference is level headed GM's usually know not to cut players cause you couldn't reach a deal in mid fugging April.

 

Your one of his blind defenders, I can already tell

Blind defender or not. Its done. Acting like a lil *#&% about it now and STILL arguing about it is lame. I will be the first to pay front row tickets when YOU make in in the NFL as even a waterboy...much less a scout, and even more a GM. "level-headed" what? GTFO a here with that mess.

[Castavar]

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Changing the subject? LOL

I find happiness the second you come out from under Gettleman table. 

There is no subject. Just you complaining like always.

[Sam Mills Fan]

40 minutes ago, Rags said:

Read the post, decided to blow this up.

The difference between paying Sherman and Peterson is when they're in their 30s/Close to their 30s, theyy're be near the end or at the end of their contracts. Josh will be in the 2nd year of his 5 year deal when he's 30. 

And unless you're Champ Bailey or Charles Woodson, 30s are around the time CBs start dropping off a bit. 

This is a myth created by Carolina Huddle over the past two weeks. We've known this about running backs for a long time, but I've never heard in my life about age 30 being a wall corners can't go past until random anonymous posters on the Huddle started saying so 2 weeks ago. Josh Norman and Richard Sherman are the exact same age.

[GoobyPls]

Just now, coralreefer_1 said:

Blind defender or not. Its done. Acting like a lil *#&% about it now and STILL arguing about it is lame. I will be the first to pay front row tickets when YOU make in in the NFL as even a waterboy...much less a scout, and even more a GM. "level-headed" what? GTFO a here with that mess.

Looks like I offended another one. God forbid anyone talk negative about their Fuhrer they come at you like rabid dogs

[GoobyPls]

2 minutes ago, Castavar said:

There is no subject. Just you complaining like always.

I replied to the thread, you replied to me looking for an arguement, you ended losing, thus changing the topic

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

did you just compare a guy who makes personnel decisions for an NFL team to adolf hitler

[TheRumGone]

20 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

IDK about losses but it  will affect team in a sense that LBs will have to take on more responsiblity and will burden them slightly in doing their own assignments. Specifially the play where  Luke tipped the ball away from WR and started yelling at Finnegan trying to cover up that mistake. 

Eh you're singling out one play by a mid season couch pickup. Don't think this really changes anything the linebackers will do too much. 

Im not trying to downplay Josh. Losing him is a deal, but it's not as earth shattering as some people claim.