Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Miller of Bleacher Report: "I give the pick a B, they have other needs but I've realized not to go against G-Man."


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Hate it when ppl grade based on need. Shows they have no idea what they are talking about. You grade on the player you got that's it. 

I wouldn't say that. Hypothetically if we have Cam Newton, and get another QB in the first who is BPA. But we have a huge hole at CB and there is a very good CB on the board.

Would you consider that an A?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PantherBoy95 said:

I wouldn't say that. Hypothetically if we have Cam Newton, and get another QB in the first who is BPA. But we have a huge hole at CB and there is a very good CB on the board.

Would you consider that an A?

I really think most GM's don't add QBs into the BPA equation.

You either need a QB... or you don't.

If you have one, you don't need one.  At other positions you can have adequate starters but you will always need depth at those positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tiger7_88 said:

I really think most GM's don't add QBs into the BPA equation.

You either need a QB... or you don't.

If you have one, you don't need one.  At other positions you can have adequate starters but you will always need depth at those positions.

True, I was trying to greatly exaggerate to make the point. I do think grades should be PARTIALLY based on need. If you have good depth at RB and BPA is RB, but you have a Byron Bell at LT and a good LT is out there I think you take the LT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...