Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFLDraft Scout 7 round mock draft


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Swaggasaurus said:

I can't get on board with Ifedi with Dodd available, neither will Gettleman. I'll tell you what tho, if the round 2 and 3 picks went that way I would be thrilled

If we take Dodd at 30,we don't need another DE at 93. Enter Shon Coleman, LT from Auburn.  He needs some work, but we got oher as our starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

If we take Dodd at 30,we don't need another DE at 93. Enter Shon Coleman, LT from Auburn.  He needs some work, but we got oher as our starter. 

 

Kinda nice to be able to draft for the future. Of course nowadays, most kids need some sort of grooming anyway. Kids just aren't as fundamentally sound as they used to be. Makes it a tad bit more important to hit on those higher picks. Maybe their development time will be shorter than some of the later round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, carolina-chuck2 said:

I don't like this draft. I think we'll get a good player at 30, but it's up in the air. 

 

My pick, Treadwell. He ran at his pro day like he wanted to be a Panther.

As much as I like Coleman and Shepard, I don't see how we pass on Treadwell if he is there.  Forget the numbers, the tape tells you everything you need to know on Treadwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Outside of Sterling Shepard there at 62, this mock is poop for me.

RD1: Coleman, Dodd, Alexander (Instead of Ifedi)

RD2: JACKPOT!!! (Not likely)

RD3: Booker would be a steal at the end of RD3, Jonathan Williams (my RB draft crush.. though he's available still in RD4), Hooper, or Vannett

RD4: Murphy would be a good guy to sit for a year or two, and replace Oher, Jonathan Williams in the 4th would be akin to the Shepard steal in the 2nd... no way he's here, but if we went Hooper/Vannett in the 3rd, Williams in the 4th, it would be a true DG coup.

RD5: Brown isn't really a bad pick considering what's left, so no huge movement here.  I'd also go with SAF Kearse or OT Brandon Shell

RD6: Jared Allen Trade..... though I think DG moves into the 6th if a guy falls.  I don't think he'll pick in the 7th, so some guys in this range could be Spencer Drango, or one of the kickers.

 

Just my 2 pennies..... for whatever that's worth. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw that too--and what you said made sense because there is something like that in the rules--said that he is unlikely to get picked up (and I was not suggesting that we do) and Jones wants to go to a winning team.   After getting beaten to death in NY behind a sub par OL, poor WRs, and brutal fan base, I get it. 
    • True.  Sam and Baker did not do well here but went on to better things under better coaching, circumstances or both.  The real question is, ‘why aren’t the Panthers able to get improved performance out of ‘broken toys’, similar to Minnesota and Tampa? That is a rhetorical question.  I think we know the answer.   [The cultural reference to Pogo dates me, I’ll admit.]
    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
×
×
  • Create New...