Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gettleman's 1st round options


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

I really like the list of picks that could be there late in the 1st.  It's very hard to choose among some very exciting players.  I seriously could see Gettleman trading up to pick early in the 2nd to snag a second one of these guys.

Interesting that there are no CBs on this list.  I expect us to pick a CB in the 3rd or 4th.  It's a very deep CB class.  Some decent CBs (names like Cyrus Jones, Zach Sanchez, Harlan Miller) should be there in later rounds.

A bit surprised there are not more top OTs (names like Conkllin, Decker...)  whom we've visited with.  But it does seem like the way the draft board is setting up, the true round 1 OTs will be gone when we pick, and I'm guessing DG likes one of the later round guys we've visited with (Haeg, Beavers, Shell) enough to pass on an OT in round 1 or 2.

Here's my guess on how the draft goes for us by position:

Round 1:  DE / DT,  but if none we like are left WR or possibly RB (D. Henry)

Round 2: Safety, WR  (very possible we trade up to take someone like Cravens or Sterling if they're still on the board)

Round 3 - 4:  CB, OT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using the NFL.com rankings /grades  (these are from 2 weeks ago, there may be some changes in rankings...) I highlighted players Panthers have met with.  It shows several distinct groups as I noted above.  DE/DT;  S / WR;  CB

Here are the top 30 players we've looked at, based on NFL.com grades:

Group1.png

group2.png

Group3.png

I find it notable that we've visited with very few players ranked from 48 - 70.  It strongly suggests to me that we'll try to move up in round 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

     -  Found this good piece of information on reddit, Panthers.com -

INTERESTING NOTE:Gettleman has 1st rounders in for a pre draft visit. (self.panthers)

submitted 12 hours ago by BananaGooP

In every year that Dave Gettleman has been the GM he has had the player he picks in the first round in for a pre-draft visit. In 2015 he had Shaq Thompson and D.J. Humphries in.(Humphries would have been the pick if Arizona had not picked him first) In 2014 he had Kelvin Benjamin, Kony Ealy and Corey(Philly) Brown in for pre draft visits. In 2013 he had Kawann Short in, and 2 unnamed players. I would wager a good amount of money that one of those 2 unnamed was Star.

Because of this it is likely that their 2016 pick has already been in for a visit. We can eliminate all players who have not met with Carolina for a workout of private meeting because everything else is not "official." Next we can eliminate players who are clearly not first rounders. There is a handful of prospects who are likely second round picks on this list, but they are not clearly out of the first round and therefore should be included. The STMs are likely private meetings or workouts. I also believe Shepard has been in for a visit. Now here is the list:

  • Vonn Bell, S, Ohio State (STM)
  • Tyler Boyd, WR, Pittsburgh (COM, WOR)
  • Vernon Butler, DT/NT, Louisiana Tech (SR, WOR, PRI)
  • Corey Coleman, WR, Baylor (STM)
  • Su'a Cravens, OLB, USC (STM)
  • Kevin Dodd, DE, Clemson (PRI)
  • Derrick Henry, RB, Alabama (STM, PRI)
  • Germain Ifedi, OT, Texas A&M (COM, PRI, WOR)
  • Jayron Kearse, S, Clemson (STM)
  • Shaq Lawson, DE/3-4OLB, Clemson (PRI, WOR)
  • Emmanuel Ogbah, DE/3-4DE, Oklahoma State (WOR)
  • Jarran Reed, DT/3-4DE/NT, Alabama (WOR, PRI)
  • A'Shawn Robinson, DT/3-4DE/NT, Alabama (PRI)
  • Sterling Shepard, WR, Oklahoma (COM)
  • Darian Thompson, S, Boise State (PRI, WOR)

From this list my bet would be IF Lawson, Ogbah, Robinson or Coleman fall they will be picked up and outside of that I would say it is likely Su'a Cravens, Vonn Bell, or Germain Ifedi.


Info Gathering:

That's a good list of prospects right there. Depending on the grades they could move up ala funchess of the price is right. Maybe see 2 of that list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't usually follow draft picks until about this time and from your list I looked up 3 of these guys and here is what I like:

Ogbah - quick first step, long arms, doesn't let Olineman get their hands on him much

Cravens - would be great SS for us I believe, quick enough to cover an area and is not afraid of contact AT ALL, this guy puts a hat on you

Shepherd - I know this will sound blasphemous around here but you can't watch his highlight tape and not think to yourself...is this Smitty reincarnate?  Fast, battles for everything, not afraid of going across the middle and making a tough catch while being hammered, catches EVERYTHING.  I could definitely see him as a slot or possible WR2 or KR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely we've expressed some interest in Karl Joseph. I was watching him last night and he absolutely is a guy that fits this team's persona. Pursuit to the ball, big blows, turnovers. 

 

There are number of good safety prospects at the top of the class 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

Surely we've expressed some interest in Karl Joseph. I was watching him last night and he absolutely is a guy that fits this team's persona. Pursuit to the ball, big blows, turnovers. 

 

There are number of good safety prospects at the top of the class 

Definitely.  In the first 3 rounds, there are some great ones.

Karl Joseph, Keanu Neal, Jeremy Cash, Darian Thompson, Miles Killebrew...I'd be happy with any of them.  And now there's the buzz around TJ Green. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just a Gettleman thing iirc (from reading a past article), I don't believe that the franchise has ever picked a player in the first without some type of meeting. And, yes, a couple of these have been private in the past, and it didn't come out that we had any contact with them until after the fact.

That being said, Hunter Henry must have had a clandestine meeting with us, or he is not deemed first round material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely would love if Sterling Shepard is the one by the way. Kid has some game and would make his presence known from day one. I think that Cravens would do the same. I think Henry might not make as great of a day one impact, but that he would be very involved, and perhaps the most prolific overall going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Cravens wouldn't be next to Davis, Kuechly and Thompson. He'd be playing behind them. Most scouts see him as a safety, not a linebacker. Su'a is gonna be a killer in-box SS.

Su'a apparently is getting a lot of looks from Pittsburgh, Baltimore, New England, Detroit and Kansas City. He's definitely going in the first round now. 

I strongly disagree that Cravens goes in round 1, I think teams will look at the true SS like Neal and Joseph before him. Cash, Bell, and Cravens should go at around the same time, mid 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of immature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.   
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...