Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pulled The Trigger (MNF)


Lilsmitty09

Recommended Posts

Booked plane tickets literally 5 minutes after the schedule came out because everything lined up perfectly and plane tix were cheap at the moment for a trip to Charlotte in October. Gonna be my first MNF game and my first divisional game. Only question left is....what section would you all recommend? Ticket prices are pretty high on stub hub, so I'm looking around! 

Can't wait!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

500's are my favorite by far, as long as you aren't too far up.  I've always had more fun there, than anywhere else.

That's what I've heard. How are the views though? In pictures and videos the players look like ants. I've been to 101 and 121 both times I've been in Charlotte. 101 was a section full of old people who didn't wanna stand and cheer on 3rd down, and 121 was a little bit better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isnt a bad seat in the house for MNF.  Having said that I will agree with others that the 500s are the place to be because you can see everything pretty clearly, sitting close to the field is cool but you cannot see stuff going on as easily.

Plus most of the good fights happen in the 500s!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lilsmitty09 said:

That's what I've heard. How are the views though? In pictures and videos the players look like ants. I've been to 101 and 121 both times I've been in Charlotte. 101 was a section full of old people who didn't wanna stand and cheer on 3rd down, and 121 was a little bit better.

Views aren't bad at all, until you get past about the 15th row.  I usually sit row 8 or below, and never have a problem seeing.  View is probably better than lower level, from my experience, because you can actually see  both sides of the ball, and the whole field.  You can see plays develop, and match-ups better, whereas your view is blocked from being so low, in the lower bowl.  Plus, the crowd seems so much better in the 500's.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the front row of 505 and love it. Sitting low is cool but will cost you. Also as others have said if too low then you can't see everything (plays develop etc). Get too high tho and you will have the players looking like ants as you said. Try to secure first 5 rows in upper deck if you can. My section is in the endzone and I love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You're not reading.  This isn't about his college performance. It's about his NFL prospects. The Golden Calf of Bristol was one of the greatest college players of all time. That didn't mean he was a great NFL prospect. Hunter is an elite of the elite NFL CB prospect who was a great college WR too based primarily on absurd physical talent and just natural ball skills. Could he be an elite WR if he focused on that? Honestly, probably. But in terms of him being the best WR prospect in this draft? No. His skill set is just way too raw as a WR. He just looks way more natural and instinctual playing CB.
    • Yea...another Brooks move and I yelling. I'll reserve that till I see how many holes he fills in the draft. We all know our needs at this point.
    • AND THERE IT IS Thank you, because you posted this as I was typing up my previous response and you did EXACTLY what I said the Hunter defenders do. You're taking people having very legitimate concerns about how part of his game will translate to the NFL and making it into someone talking bad about him as a college player. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING Go back and read every post I made about him this year, I consistently said he's a true generational collegiate talent, one of the rarest of them all.  But that doesn't mean jack squat when it comes to evaluating what kind of player he'll be in the NFL, or even just what position is best for him. If you want to think differently, that's totally fair, but pointing to things like stats and awards is just making you look like you don't know what you're talking about, because they don't mean anything.  There are so many instances of players putting up elite stats in college but couldn't sniff being even a serviceable NFL player.  Which again, isn't what myself or others are saying about Hunter, but it's just the proof that looking at stats/awards is a fools errand when projecting NFL potential and impact.
×
×
  • Create New...