Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

way to early 2016 prediction thread


luke nukem

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Nick_81 said:

That list averages 5-7, even if you include the 12-0 from last year.

[Edit:  Sorry - messed up the quote.  It was @coastal_cat who wrote the above.  Not Nick_81.  I pulled Coastal's quote from Nick's post... hence the confusion]

Including any season prior to 2012 or 2013 is pretty silly.  We are not the same team.

If you're going to use an average, go with the last 3 seasons.  We still have a pretty good % of our starters from 2013 onwards.

So that gives an average of 8 wins, for 8-4.  MUCH more realistic than 5-7. 

But my own prediction is somewhere between 12-4 and 16-0.  I'm waiting for the draft and training camp before coming up with a definitive prediction.  Right now my best guess would be 13-3, though I hope I'm being much too pessimistic!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a graphic demonstration of why we should ignore Coastal_Cat's prediction of 5-7 (based on an average of Panthers' seasons from 2009 - 2014.) 

Thanks to PFR, here's a table showing all of our starters since 2010.  I've highlighted those who are likely to still be on the roster in 2016 vs. those who are gone, and calculated a % of remaining starters.   We have 39% of our 2013 starters, 64% of our 2014 starters and 84% of our 2015 starters expected to return.  Thus demonstrating why trying to predict the 2016 record using 2010 or 2011 or even 2012's record is ludicrous. 

Starters_since_2010.png

Unless you expect names like Clausen, Gettis, Naanee, Fua, Godfrey .... or even Smith, Hardy, Gamble, Munnerlyn or Mitchell on the 2016 roster, you can't really pay much attention to seasons when they were the starters on our team.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...