Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Money Vs. History


Montsta

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Montsta said:

Still on the fence. May get the best of both worlds from a buddy who is willing to pay me a bit plus pay for all beer for the second ticket to go. 

I'd go myself and use the above option, free beer and the game =win/win. Warriors going for the record, means you gotta go as a fan.  

 

Of course you could use the money for a finals game...so uhh yea...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Montsta said:

Still on the fence. May get the best of both worlds from a buddy who is willing to pay me a bit plus pay for all beer for the second ticket to go. 

Sell them and they win - you still get to watch it on TV and enjoy it and have a thousand dollars in your pocket

Sell them and they lose - not being there means you win't feel as bad, and most importantly, you still have a thousand dollars

Keep them and they win - You have fun, but only for a short while since you don't have the extra thousand dollars to spend long term

Keep them and they lose - You're SOL. 

Moral of the story: The only way you're guaranteed to make something positive out of your current situation is to sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Montsta said:

Still on the fence. May get the best of both worlds from a buddy who is willing to pay me a bit plus pay for all beer for the second ticket to go. 

Do this.  Or just sell one ticket, make $500 or so and still get to see history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd sell.  Use they money on future events, multiple ones.   Go on a few Panther road game trips with that money.   I know it's a record, but there are 82 games a year for basketball and then playoffs.  I'm sure the atmosphere in the bars is going to be fun as crap too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SMH hell yes I would've sold if the Panthers were in this scenario. Hell I pocketed about 600 off my Cardinals tickets. I knew we would smash them.

It sucks for the Warriors their night got overshadowed by Kobe. When I woke up this morning all I saw on my timelines were kobe kobe kobe kobe kobe feel the bern black mamba.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reality though is that there just isn't a traditional #1 pick type of player in this draft to begin with. He might have been below Marvin last year, but I don't think he'd have been below Nabers. And if you think he disappears in some college games, then you're only looking at the box scores, I guarantee you not a single NFL GM will say he disappears in games when watching the tape. Arizona's offense is a MESS this year, the new coaching staff is beyond bad and the fanbase is screaming for them all to be fired, our OL is awful, our QB is playing like utter garbage, and we don't have another weapon to attract any defensive attention.  Teams are double and triple teaming him on almost every snap, and when combined with the OL and QB issues, it's just impossible to get him the ball sometimes.  And even when our QB forces the pass to him, half the time it's not even catchable given how poor he's been playing. And even despite all that, he's still 3rd in the nation in yards. I've also seen more WR rankings having Burden over Hunter than I have seen Hunter over T-Mac.  If we had a true outside #1 WR, then taking someone like Hunter (or Burden) instead of T-Mac would make more sense as if Hunter were to play WR in the NFL, he'd more likely be used a slot guy like Godwin or Kupp.   There's a reason most mocks/analysts who don't list Hunter as a CB/WR (or just Athlete) list him as a CB.  Because it's his better position and the side of the ball he's more likely to play in the NFL, partially due to his wire thin frame, I don't see him holding up long term as a WR.
    • This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
×
×
  • Create New...