Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Money Vs. History


Montsta

Recommended Posts

I am going to go to the Warriors game on Wednesday. My season tix are face value of about $70 each. Right now I can sell them on Stubhub for $700 each. So would it make me a bad fan to sell them and make some nice coin and just watch the game with my buddies somewhere? I've been to hundreds of Warriors games in my life, and will be going to several playoff games this year as well.

But that markup is looking pretty gotdamn good right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Montsta said:

I am going to go to the Warriors game on Wednesday. My season tix are face value of about $70 each. Right now I can sell them on Stubhub for $700 each. So would it make me a bad fan to sell them and make some nice coin and just watch the game with my buddies somewhere? I've been to hundreds of Warriors games in my life, and will be going to several playoff games this year as well.

But that markup is looking pretty gotdamn good right now. 

Sell em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of days before we lost to the Falcons I bought nose bleed tickets that were very overpriced in hoped to get to see 16-0, it is only money after all and when would that opportunity have ever arisen again?

Warriors are in a similar situation.  I guess it come down to how much you need the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...