Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy interview w/Schefter, full interview on page 17


ctrcat

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

That doesn't have poo to do with what I posted, but thanks for playing.

Translation-I don't give a rip about the Dallas Cowboys (although it is ironic that, even as a Cowboy, he had more sacks than Ealy (who I love) last year playing less games).  The last full year he played here we had the best defensive front the league has seen since the mid-80s Bears, with no on field fights with teammates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Correct me if I'm wrong but a Dv charge won't show up ever on a background check, and didn't he win his appeal??? That's what the appeal was for,to oppose the original guilty verdict. I'm in Ga unless the appeal process is worlds different I'm pretty sure that's how it works

It really doesn't matter if it shows up on a background check, or not.  That doesn't make him guilty, or not guilty.  

The appeal never happened, because she didn't show up.  That doesn't go on the record as guilty, or not guilty, because they didn't go through the appeal process.  Nowhere is there record of him being not guilty.  

If I would have known you had no idea what happened, I would have been less ass-like in my first reply.  It's obvious now, you just didn't know.  Like I said, I don't really give a poo about the, he's guilty or not, argument.  I don't know if he is, or not.  He's a piece of poo if he did do it, but I don't know.  All that aside, he's a fuging psycho idiot, and I wouldn't want him anywhere near that locker room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nick_81 said:

All that aside, he's a fuging psycho idiot, and I wouldn't want him anywhere near that locker room.

This is something I wish more people understood.

People think he's unwanted solely because of what he's done in the past. Reality is that it has just as much or more to do with who he is in the present.

He had what was, for all intents and purposes, a contract season in Dallas. Last year was his big chance to show why a team should invest a long term contract on him.

And he blew it, big time.

Not only that, but now there's this cluster @$#& of an interview. Somebody really needs to explain to Hardy that nothing good happens when he talks. He'd be way smarter to keep his mouth shut.

But, if he were "way smarter", he probably wouldn't be where he is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

Translation-I don't give a rip about the Dallas Cowboys (although it is ironic that, even as a Cowboy, he had more sacks than Ealy (who I love) last year playing less games).  The last full year he played here we had the best defensive front the league has seen since the mid-80s Bears, with no on field fights with teammates.

You really want to go there?  That's the argument you want to go with?  You realize Hardy was a full-time starter, and averaged 75% to 80% of the defensive snap counts in Dallas, right?  Ealy was barely breaking 65% of the defensive snaps when CJ was on the PUP list.  Want to guess what it went to when CJ got back?  

You may want to dig a little deeper next time you come at me with one of your little "Translation" quips.  So far, you're making yourself look like an idiot.  Maybe that's why you're supporting one so strongly...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whoever is managing Hardy needs to be fired - like 2 weeks ago needed to be fired.. anyone that said it would be a good idea to have this guy talk to the media and try and clear things up is crazy. that was the worst PR move I have even seen. He is terrible behind a mic and only dug himself deeper with that..

funny thing is - I still think he IS INNOCENT and he didn't touch her..he just cannot get out of his own way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

How many of those bashing those that bring Hardy's side to the table have shown the intelligence, willpower, support, and means to have lower level bowl season tickets since day 1 of this franchise?

Oh the irony in this sentence...

It's also extremely comical that you try to support your idiotic view, by bringing up anyone's financial situation.  Do those who think Hardy is a giant dumb-ass, need to show you a bank statement to validate their view of him?  I guess only the poverty stricken would think such silly things, right?  The powerful, lower bowl ticket holders, know Hardy is a man of great virtue.  Hey!  Dumb-asses in the upper bowl, take note!  You don't know poo!

Moron...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

How many of those bashing those that bring Hardy's side to the table have shown the intelligence, willpower, support, and means to have lower level bowl season tickets since day 1 of this franchise?

what difference does that make?

you can probably find someone with lower bowl PSLs who thinks that scam should be traded and we should start a real QB like derek anderson.  should that person's opinion carry more weight than anyone else's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ctrcat said:

How many of those bashing those that bring Hardy's side to the table have shown the intelligence, willpower, support, and means to have lower level bowl season tickets since day 1 of this franchise?

wtf does this poo have to do with anything...

just because this describes you (I am assuming) you think it means your opinions are more valuable?

 

gtfooh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, The NFL Shield At Midfield said:

what difference does that make?

you can probably find someone with lower bowl PSLs who thinks that scam should be traded and we should start a real QB like derek anderson.  should that person's opinion carry more weight than anyone else's?

True.  Just food for thought for those that brought personal attacks to an unknown person on a message board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...