Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reasons I cant trust Pitbulls


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

My aunt has a pit bull that is out of control.

They have a grandson that visits from time to time, and the dog is fine with him, but if anyone she doesn't immediately recognize enters the back yard or come around the house the dog loses her mind.

They inherited the dog when my cousin moved away, and it is indoors/outdoors whenever it wants. My aunt and uncle have had her for years.

I borrowed a canopy from them once. When I picked it up, my uncle was able to keep the dog inside. When I went to return it, the dog came flying out of the house and starts lunging at me, despite my aunt being right there trying to get her to back down. I thought, at one point, that I was going to have to kill this thing out of self defense because it kept lunging. I was able to keep the canopy between me an her until my aunt got her to back off enough for me to just drop it and back out of the gate.

There was absolutely no reason for a dog to be that vicious, especially towards someone it recognizes, is calling it by name, and is showing no threatening behavior.

I just keep waiting to hear that the dog flips it's poo and goes off on my aunt, uncle, or little cousin when he is visiting. It is a ticking time bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, YourMomsLover said:

Just saying....pits aren't the most badass of the breeds by any stretch. Pits are wonderful dogs if you don't punch them in the face constantly. 

this is bullshit...

Any dog would be better if you treat them better, but pits, for good reason, have a reputation for snapping without notice or previous incident.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Pit bulls make up only 6% of the dog population, but they’re responsible for 68% of dog attacks and 52% of dog-related deaths since 1982, according to research compiled by Merritt Clifton, editor of Animals 24-7, an animal-news organization that focuses on humane work and animal-cruelty prevention.

http://time.com/2891180/kfc-and-the-pit-bull-attack-of-a-little-girl/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Bronn said:

this is bullshit...

Any dog would be better if you treat them better, but pits, for good reason, have a reputation for snapping without notice or previous incident.
 

Whatever you say man, but I've had a blue/brendle pit bull and a chihuahua in the same house and the chihuahua ran that bitch so. 

Its all in how they are raised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Another report published in the April 2011 issue of Annals of Surgery found that one person is killed by a pit bull every 14 days, two people are injured by a pit bull every day, and young children are especially at risk. The report concludes that “these breeds should be regulated in the same way in which other dangerous species, such as leopards, are regulated.” That report was shared with TIME by PETA, the world’s largest animal-rights organization.

If PETA comes out and says this is a dangerous animal, then I would probably go ahead and believe it, despite whatever attachments or nostalgia you have towards this breed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pits require early training, put in the lowest position of dominance in the house, and need to be socialized if you plan on having them around other people. I have to deal with dogs a lot at work and I've had 1 pit charge me because the owner let it out while i was working in the back yard, which was it's territory, and I've been bitten a couple times by small dogs. 

The pits that I have dealt with that have been trained well have been absolute babies around me. I had one that I couldn't get out of my lap because he thought he was 15lbs instead of 90. 

These dogs can't just be left alone or go untrained. Just because you are bigger does not mean you are the alpha, and too many ignorant fools don't understand this. They get the dogs, do absolutely nothing with them, then act shocked when they don't behave. I will say there are way too much breeding of them without any regard to bloodlines, but that isn't the dogs fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No dog attack is really the dog's fault tbqh. I mean, humans shouldn't have really domesticated animals to be pets/companions in my opinion. Also, we should have never started bringing "pets" indoors if you ask me. Don't even get me started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...