Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Plain vs Peanut M&Ms


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

This twitter post got me thinking...

 

 

What is more disturbing to me here is that they are plain M&Ms. I was unaware anyone older than 6 consumes them. 

 

Peanut M&Ms are clearly the superior product in every way possible. Not only in taste, but also in terms of empty calories. At least peanut M&Ms give you a bit of protein and keep you full longer. 

 

What say you?

 

This is about Peanut vs Regular M&Ms. I am aware there are other candies available. We don't care how cool you are by throwing some random obscure candy out into the conversation. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Love them too. Maybe more than Peanut M&Ms but not as widely available. 

Agree...but some things in life are worth searching for and these are one of them. Almond MMs might be be the greatest candy on Earth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osd22 said:

Peanut. However, the Mint M&Ms are my favourite. I'm addicted to them. 

For Valentine's Day they released Strawberry M&Ms , they were horrible, fake strawberry flavor, and I knew the would be, but for always trying new candy research, it had to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Entering year three, and there are reasons I would look into this more before offering a fourth or fifth. He was drafted in round 2 in 2023.  His rookie season, he played 14 games and was targeted 40 times.  Targeted 3 times a game, basically.  He caught 27 (67.5%).  A TE target/catch percentage should be higher than a WR--70-75% is considered good.  In 11 games this season, he was targeted 32 times and caught 21.  Again, about 3 receptions per game, with a target catch percentage of 66%. They decided to draft a TE after his rookie season. This means they did not see him as a #1 TE. He has not been very healthy (9 missed games in 2 seasons). Could he be better with a better QB?  Probably.  Having said all that, he is an excellent blocking TE.  I would trade a fifth for him, but only if I knew Thomas and Tremble were not coming back.  
    • 4th, 5th or later for him all day. Get it done ASAP.
    • the personal problems is something that would have to be checked out, but I'd do it.  That's how we got Greg Olsen.  He was a first round pick and we traded a 3rd for him a couple of years later.  He became our best TE ever
×
×
  • Create New...