Mike Tolbert “I may be on the move, you never know.”

[CPcavedweller]

On 3/6/2016 at 1:50 PM, Kuechly59 said:

That has less to do with Tolbert that it does opponents and other players that were hurt.... He played in both our losses this season..... Contributed to the sb loss.s

This is a terrible argument and doesn't refute the original point at all. He played in our losses, yes, but he also played in most all of our wins (17 in case you didn't know). In 2014 we won a single game without him in the line-up and 8 with him. 

If you are to say there isn't causation i'd like for you to present a more plausible argument for our struggles that coincided with Tolberts absence in 2014.

I'll wait. 

[Jmac]

On Sunday, March 06, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Paa Langfart said:

Would seriously like us to pick Ward back up - the guy is a friggin beast - anyone know what he is up to these days?

Isn't he a one note pony? Good blocker, but can't carch a cold. If he had an upside wouldn't he be on the practice squad?

[MechaZain]

9 hours ago, imminent rogaine said:

I still think we try to square-peg/round-hole the guy. So-so blocker and terrible short-yardage back, despite how we use him. Very good in the passing game but not used there enough. I'd rather have a legitimate traditional full back (lee ward-type) but if losing Tolbert means we are putting Dickson or someone like that back as a blocker, no thanks; just bring Tolbert back.

Wouldn't call him terrible short-yardage. Maybe now, but Prime Tolbert is a guaranteed yard or three. Agree completely that we don't pass to him enough though, and if we aren't bringing in a stout blocker I'd rather they keep the Cam/Stewart/Tolbert triple threat.

[aussiePanther]

Two years, $4M. I'm happy.