Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ghostbusters


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Am I the only person who hates Melissa McCarthy?  I like the other 3...hate her. I feel like this is going to be awful

I'm in the same boat.  I don't see why everyone loves her?  Like she has the tools to be extremely funny, but she's just not.  I don't get the adoration everyone has for her movies.

On to the actual movie, I'm interested based on the other three cast members.  It looks like it has potential to be fun, but it's going to be extremely difficult to match the OG (Original Ghostbusters!).  

I want to like it, but when compared to the 1986 trailer, it does seem the lesser film.  My hope is that they do a good job of making it fairly logical why they become Ghostbusters.  I'm not really sure how connected the two films are. So that's really weird for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Panthro said:

I mean I hope the Gremlins reboot doesn't have that female gremlin in it or I am going to faux-rage....make me a sammie woman derp

Another movie I just can't see working out because it's an 80's movie.  Same with Goonies, Lost Boys, Karate Kid, etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/3/2016 at 3:51 PM, CCS said:

I like how they make a movie pandering to feminists but put in one of the most blatant black stereotypes ever.

You know you're on the wrong side of something when twylyght starts pieing you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First on T-Mac, I 100% expect him to be the top WR from this class, however I think expecting him to put up 1k+ as a rookie isn't necessarily fair, especially since you're putting it in perspective of how many other rookie WRs have done that in recent years. And Thielen is the reason for that. Not many (if any) of those 1k+ rookies had someone like Thielen there when they were drafted, and no matter how good T-Mac is this year, Bryce is still going to lean on his existing chemistry with Thielen unless he's drastically lost a step this offseason and just can't get open like he's been able to in his career. As I pointed out in another thread the other day, looking at MHJ last year is the way to look at T-Mac's season if Thielen plays a full and healthy season.  MHJ had McBride "steal" 110+ catches and 1,100+ yards in what was a pass happy offense (Kyler was 9th in the league in attempts), it's going to be hard for any rookie to put up more than the 800ish yards he had last year in that scenario.  Especially if we follow a similar game plan to last year and be a run heavy team. In terms of XL, you're completely right, jumping up to get a project 2/3 isn't smart, and if we knew we needed a future slot from that pick, yes, Ladd would have been a much better pick. But at this point, those are all sunk costs, even taking T-Mac at 8 is now considered a sunk cost. Forgetting the past or who we maybe should have taken last year now knowing future roles, I still think T-Mac, XL, Coker can be one of the Top 1-3 WR rooms in the NFL in a few years, I honestly think they really do have that potential in them.
    • Maybe we should have just drafted a corner?  Crazy, I know.  One of the few positions we knew had to be addressed in the draft and nadda.
×
×
  • Create New...