Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

if you had 3 meals to eat for the next 3 months?(real question for weight loss and endurance training)


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Anybodyhome said:

You gotta have either carbs or fat if you're going to endurance train. If you go low- or no-carb, you won't have the ability to do any endurance stuff. Your body has to either burn fat or carbs once you've burned through everything else. 

Oh it will burn muscle, which is what I'm concerned about most, I have enough body fat that I'm trying to burn that off. but I've lost a lot a muscle when I went from 275-170 because of this issue. going to try to go high protein to help this. not trying to put on muscle but just keep what I have

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KendrickPanther said:

Thanks for this info. Wish my body had gotten more efficient at processing Bojangles. I'd have never gained weight!

It's kinda something for training though, if you eat pizza every day your body will eventually get used to processing the pizza, but if you dont do the workout to burn the calories/carbs you will get fat. 

If you ever want to know exactly what I'm talking about with your body adjusting to what you eat, go ultra low carb for a month. Your first 2 weeks you will be constantly hungry and zapped of energy, you will think what the F*** am I thinking, and after your body adjust you will be fine, and have plenty of energy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Doc Holiday said:

the calories is tricky because I do want to lose weight, just not muscle mass if possible, so I'm going to try and go high protein, 2 days a week still working on strength. I did solely strength training for the month before now, and have put on about 5lbs in muscle. 

as for carb load, I have that down rather well, used to be a swimmer, and still know how to do that.

Once you tip the lose weight/gain muscle scale in your direction and everything comes together, you'll know it. I rarely got on scales and usually paid more attention to my diet. I did stay on top of my body fat measurements, though. But when you run a race or finish a good, strong training week, something just clicks and you realize you're exactly where you need to be. My training epiphany hit me in 1986 when I got to spend an entire calendar year at home without a deployment. My weight was good, the bike felt great wherever and whenever I rode and it all just came together. I think I competed more that year than ever, qual'd for my first Ironman Hawaii and had a couple good finishes in some century bike races.

But let me warn you about competition, because the recovery is everything. I routinely lost 8-12 pounds in 5-6 hours doing century bike races and recovering from that alone can ruin your entire regimen if you don't do it right. You have to keep up some level of exercise, at least walking or biking just to keep the movements going. If you just take 3-4 days off and do nothing while eating and trying to get your strength back, you'll have issues. You don't have to work out hard, but you've got to keep moving.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter how many meals you eat. Just get the calories/macros you need to maintain your muscle and lose weight. 20lb in 3 months is doable but you will need to have a high calorie intake and a killer workout to make sure your body doesn't burn muscle instead of the fat. Can't go wrong with chicken, broccoli and rice btw. Meal of champions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.

oatmeal

Natural peanut butter or almond butter 

almonds

cinnamon

protein shake

 

2.

Quinoa

roasted chicken w/o skin

sundried tomatoes

artichoke hearts 

(^slow cooker recipe--5 days of lunch/dinner prepared at once)

 

3.

Sirloin or top round prepared with coconut oil 

wheat rice noodles tossed in peanut sauce OR sweet potato (broiled w a little s&p and drizzled with a bit of olive oil)

veggies

 

You need the carbs to perform. But you also need to shed fat. Starting with a regular amount of carbs and slowly decreasing that intake will help the body learn to burn fat while avoiding plateaus--the body has to have somewhere to go. If you do low carbs at the outset you won't be able to lower your intake any further to get over any plateaus that may stop your progress. Also, expect to feel more fatigue/lethargy  on your carb cutting steps as the body starts to adapt to burning more fat stores.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...