Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Pro Football Focus - Panthers free agency strategy


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

Carolina came so close to a fairytale season, losing at the final hurdle in the Super Bowl after notching 17 wins over the course of the season and snagging both Coach of the Year and MVP in the end-of-season honors.

The work starts now for a team looking to contend again in 2016 with free agency rolling around, allowing them to retain some of their own players, let some others walk, and maybe target some new players to add to the mix.

Let’s preview the upcoming free agency period from the perspective of the Carolina Panthers’ front office.

Re-sign

CB Josh Norman

The Panthers have one major priority with regards to their own players hitting the open market, and that is re-signing Josh Norman, the cornerback who has developed into a shutdown player at the position. Over the past two seasons, Norman has allowed a passer rating into his coverage of 53.9 in 2014 and 58.1 in 2015. For much of this season, teams were better off throwing the ball away every play than they were targeting Norman, from a passer rating standpoint. He has become one of the best corners in the league, and needs to be locked down long-term—even if it takes the franchise tag to buy enough time to do it.

FB Mike Tolbert, S Roman Harper, P Brad Nortman, and/or G Amini Silatolu

After Norman, it’s a case of extending some depth or bit-part players if they so choose. Mike Tolbert isn’t any kind of punishing lead-blocker, but is a useful and versatile player to have in the backfield, especially with all of the option plays the Panthers run. Roman Harper somehow played well for Carolina, despite some very ugly performances in New Orleans before he came over, and could be retained as a short-term option at safety. Amini Silatolu was very poor as a rookie starter, surrendering four sacks and 27 additional pressures, but since then, as a bit-part player, has been far better and may still have potential as a long-term backup for relatively little money. Brad Nortman is also due a new deal at punter.

Let walk

WR Jerricho Cotchery, CB Charles Tillman, and CB Cortland Finnegan

The Panthers have an ideal set of potential free agents hitting the market—players they brought in to help them out as veterans, but are long past their best. Jerricho Cotchery has been a fine pro, but was unable to run away from Von Miller—an edge rusher—in the Super Bowl, and both Charles Tillman, and Cortland Finnegan are likely surplus to requirements at corner.

Target

WR Marvin Jones

The Panthers aren’t swimming in cap space if they have to devote some significant money to Josh Norman, and are even more squeezed if they need to use the franchise tag to keep him in town. They are also a roster without too many obvious holes. Receiver is one clear issue, but this is not a great crop to choose from. They could make a run at Marvin Jones, who may be the best viable target for them at that spot. Jones is dynamic with the ball in his hands, having broken double-digit tackles in each of his last two healthy seasons for Cincinnati.

OT Bobby Massie or OT Andre Smith

OT is their problem spot on the O-line, with Michael Oher a poor run-blocker this season and Mike Remmers badly exposed in the Super Bowl as a pass-blocker. They may not have the funds needed to make a run at one of the best available tackles, but a player like Bobby Massie or Andre Smith has shown quality play in the past, and may be a viable option to compete for the starting spot.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2016/02/18/pro-re-signing-free-agent-josh-norman-priority-no-1-for-panthers/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I disagree that receiver is a "clear issue" with Benjamin back, Funchess developing and Ginn improving.

And hell no on Bobby Massie. He was horrible in the NFC Championship.

You still want more depth than we had. It's something we need at some point. Injuries will always be a factor in an NFL season, getting more depth at WR is a good thing to have. We have KB, Funchess, Ginn, and Brown as reliable starters. That's it. Bersin has flashed some potential, (just not returning punts please god), so going out and getting Marvin Jones would be great.

My pipe dream is to grab Mohamed Sanu if Cincy lets him walk, but I'm afraid that's just a pipe dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thanatos said:

You still want more depth than we had. It's something we need at some point. Injuries will always be a factor in an NFL season, getting more depth at WR is a good thing to have. We have KB, Funchess, Ginn, and Brown as reliable starters. That's it. Bersin has flashed some potential, (just not returning punts please god), so going out and getting Marvin Jones would be great.

My pipe dream is to grab Mohamed Sanu if Cincy lets him walk, but I'm afraid that's just a pipe dream.

I'm okay with adding depth. Where I disagree is the notion that this position group is a "clear problem".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I disagree that receiver is a "clear issue" with Benjamin back, Funchess developing and Ginn improving.

And hell no on Bobby Massie. He was horrible in the NFC Championship.

Don't forgot how well Philly played down the stretch, and even the enigma Hill is back. WR's not a concern to me, we'll possibly add some depth/competition in the draft but I see any way we go after Jones (possibly the top available WR outside of Alshon), nor should we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

 

The Panthers have an ideal set of potential free agents hitting the market—players they brought in to help them out as veterans, but are long past their best. Jerricho Cotchery has been a fine pro, but was unable to run away from Von Miller—an edge rusher—in the Super Bowl, and both Charles Tillman, and Cortland Finnegan are likely surplus to requirements at corner.

 

Again, Gettleman knows what he's doing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't agree with Harper, he should be let go. It's time for young guys to step in there and do their jobs. I've seen enough to know that sometimes the vets take away playing time from the younger players because of seniority, that's an issue that has been with rivera since he took over. Yes veterans are savvy and can get it done, but you can't develop young talent if you keep them off the field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Don't agree with Harper, he should be let go. It's time for young guys to step in there and do their jobs. I've seen enough to know that sometimes the vets take away playing time from the younger players because of seniority, that's an issue that has been with rivera since he took over. Yes veterans are savvy and can get it done, but you can't develop young talent if you keep them off the field. 

yeah, Harper id not coming back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Did I mention that he was on worse teams?  Yes.  Do QBs alone win games?  No.  Did Cam, on a much better team with some awesome defenses ever have 2 consecutive winning seasons?  No.  So now you are cherry picking,  If the overall stats are similar, you take a look at him.   I told you that you look at his skill set---but you wanted to tell me that he sucks and mentioned performance.  I just presented performance--and his numbers are very similar to Cam Newton's numbers--a player most call the best Panther QB ever--and I agree.  By the way, Fumbles are evidence of how bad his OL has been--so you are saying that a QB in a situation worse than Cam's who has stats and physical abilities very similar to Cam's should not be given a look when you have Bryce Young at QB?  You are going with that story because you simply talked your way into a corner and now you are trying to save face.  No good GM would do what you suggest because "he sucks."  Sorry, but the facts do not support you.  But no matter what eye-opening details I provide, there are some who are going to go their Google machines to try to find some reason to support an ignorant approach to developing the QB position.  You ignored the similarities to Cam and went cherry picking.  I know what you are doing--but I am only suggesting (as I have stated before) that we bring him in as one of three approaches to resolving the QB issue. Compete with Bryce and draft a QB. Basically, I am suggesting that Jones has the potential to replace Dalton and compete with Young.  He is a battered stock that could get better in a better situation--that is human nature.  Instead, I am called a Daniel Jones lover and superfan.  That is good debate--But a real sign of mature thinking is the inability to LOGICALLY consider alternative perspectives--which is actually a characteristic of intelligence.  Just so you know, I critique and perform research in my job.  I am often amazed at how the numbers do not support my suppositions.  I learned that my impression is often wrong until I look at the data.  In this case, I have considered all the important variables and he should get a shot.  Numbers don't lie--and when you and others resort to twisted name calling directed toward the poster--it verifies my position.  
    • I don’t get this, I know that is the popular thought process but I just don’t think it’s true.  For instance head to head last year the ACC had a winning record against the SEC.  The SEC had a losing record in bowl games. This year so far the head to head is 2-3 SEC and that’s with a fluke Vandy win in week one.  I see the ACC taking another head to head winning season after next week.  The SEC is mostly hype with 3 good teams, in my opinion.  But to say any ACC team would get exposed I believe is a stretch 
    • What the hell?  How is presenting Cam's stats hating him?  The point is not to hate Cam, it is to show you how similar Jones is to him and why you take a look at him.  I mentioned Jones has the skill set to take a look--the response is, "look at his 5 years of performance."  So I compare him to the greatest QB in franchise history, and the stats are similar--while Jones was in a worse situation.  Now that is "hating?"  Come on.  This is a meritless, ignorant, personal attack because you are wrong.  Just stop it.  You all attack the poster when you have nothing.  So saying "we should consider a guy with similar stats and size to Cam Newton" is now hating Cam and making me a Jones super fan- that is just stupid.  
×
×
  • Create New...