Peyton Manning's Sexual Assault Case

[Sam Mills Fan]

5 hours ago, 15 said:

Hahaha Sam Mills Fan has literally destroyed any sort of respect he had on this forum in just the last week.

First time I ever saw you post was like 3 weeks ago. You need to get over your hard-on for me my boy.

[Sam Mills Fan]

4 hours ago, SOJA said:

are you fuging serious? 

Yes. Do you know the difference between sexual assault and rape? They're not interchangeable.

[Mother Grabber]

manning has been an entitled douche his whole life. I was at UT coaching the PU men's water polo team...awesome place for a tourney btw. After the game, some players are at a party where Manning shows up. when greeting people, he asked, "what's it like to shake the hand of Peyton Manning?"

i also have heard multiple accounts from friends in Indy where he would try to get their date/girlfriend/wife to leave the guy they were with and join him at dinner.

fug Manning and his transparent image. he's a douche, and will always be a douche. he needs tiger woods' wife to teach him how poo works.

[davideinstein]

I'm not really worried about what others think. Cam has taken my favorite NFL team to a different level. It's cant miss football on Sunday. Not really worried about people's view on him vs. a white quarterback from the south in an inheritantly racist society. It is what it is.

[hank pimple butt]

I saw the same story years ago. I think on ESPN. And it had people saying boys will be boys. The one they did on frostee Rucker, its amazing he is not in prison, let alone being a active player

[Star Lord]

1 hour ago, pinkfloyd said:

Does anyone have any idea why this is all coming to light NOW?  If the Manning machine has been able to keep a lid on it all these years, why now?  Why couldn't they continue to keep it under the radar.....  I wonder if it would have all remained under wraps if Peyton hadn't gotten his second ring?  Interesting if the ring brought about karmic justice...

Shaun King wrote an article about Cam and all the backlash he has been getting. In the comments someone mentioned how Peyton was accused of sex harassment. So S.King looked into it and found that USA Today basically killed the story so he looked into it.

[Rags]

40 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Yes. Do you know the difference between sexual assault and rape? They're not interchangeable.

By definition, no, he didn't rape her. But by definition, he molested her.

And before you go "That's not molestation!"

"assault or abuse (a person, especially a woman or child) sexually."

Sit the fug down and shut the fug up with this "boys will be boys" bullshit you're spewing.

[Sam Mills Fan]

12 minutes ago, Rags said:

By definition, no, he didn't rape her. But by definition, he molested her.

And before you go "That's not molestation!"

"assault or abuse (a person, especially a woman or child) sexually."

Sit the fug down and shut the fug up with this "boys will be boys" bullshit you're spewing.

Wrong again. I said he should have been charged with sexual assault back then, please read. But should that mean he should be branded as a sexual predator in 2016? Nope! People change. Should we think of Cam as a thief because he stole someone's laptop in college? Nope! People change. And before someone accuses me of this next: Am I saying larceny as bad as sexual assault? Nope! That means nothing though and I didn't say that. Unless you commit a first-degree felony or do something that leads to someone's death, we should really let things go. We shouldn't hold something that happened in 1996 against Peyton and we shouldn't hold something that happened in 2008 against Cam.

[Sam Mills Fan]

1 hour ago, Allaine said:

In your world it's not the same.  In my world it's the same.  

Again, no it literally is not. Rape is forcible penetration, period. Giving it other definitions is what brings us idiots on Twitter that say they're raped when a guy says they have a nice ass. Sexual harassment is bad, sexual assault is very bad, rape is heinous. Rape can get you 15-life, rubbing your dick on someone's face cannot.

[Star Lord]

Buying a stolen laptop <<<<<< sexually assaulting someone hahahahaha.

 

Not sure what that stmt reads to be..   the use of the  < or > depends on what your inferring too.  

Stolen laptop < sexual assault reads  laptop is less than 

stolen laptop > sexual assault  reads laptop is greater than.   So if your trying to say buying a stolen laptop is > (greater) crime than sexually assaulting someone hhahahah  YES I agree I find it funny that ppl (critics/media) crucifies Cam for this and brings it up almost every third article written about Cam, yet PM writes about the assault in his book, has to settle outta court about it and it is never brought up ever again for 10yrs.  (2003 is when the lady brought the slander case on PM)

Now I read on Fox Sports that they are saying this article is being written by a tabloid paper so it shouldn't be taken seriously. OMG..  

[KushMcDieselson]

12 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Wrong again. I said he should have been charged with sexual assault back then, please read. But should that mean he should be branded as a sexual predator in 2016? Nope! 

When normal people are charged with sex crimes they are required to register as sex offenders, which follows them around for life, affecting things like where they can and cannot live, obtaining gainful employment, and even places they are allowed to go.  So why exactly should he not be branded a sexual deviant in 2016?

As others have inquired and you have yet to answer(unless I missed it), would you be so quick to say "boys will be boys" if your mother/wife/sister/daughter/etc. came home and told you some 20 year old boy rubbed his cock and balls on her face and head against her will? 

If your answer is yes, you are either one fuged up individual, or you consider your mother/wife/sister/daughter/etc. to be of the promiscuous (aka "whore who was asking for it") variety of females, a fuged up view either way you go, because the only sane and correct answer would be "Hell no, because it's not OK to rub your cock and balls on a female without their consent!"

[Sam Mills Fan]

2 minutes ago, KushMcDieselson said:

When normal people are charged with sex crimes they are required to register as sex offenders, which follows them around for life, affecting things like where they can and cannot live, obtaining gainful employment, and even places they are allowed to go.  So why exactly should he not be branded a sexual deviant in 2016?

As others have inquired and you have yet to answer(unless I missed it), would you be so quick to say "boys will be boys" if your mother/wife/sister/daughter/etc. came home and told you some 20 year old boy rubbed his cock and balls on her face and head against her will? 

If your answer is yes, you are either one fuged up individual, or you consider your mother/wife/sister/daughter/etc. to be of the promiscuous (aka "whore who was asking for it") variety of females, a fuged up view either way you go, because the only sane and correct answer would be "Hell no, because it's not OK to rub your cock and balls on a female without their consent!"

Oh brother, no person in this country, celebrity or not, rich or poor, is a registered sex offender because they rubbed their dick on someone's face 20 years ago. And for the last f'ing time, I said he probably should have been charged with something assuming that this woman is telling the truth. 

 

Funny how on the Huddle I was a hero for defending Cam's past with the laptop when people kept citing that as a reason not to draft him and mostly a hero for saying Hardy was probably not guilty (until I researched more and determined he was absolutely guilty), but I'm a rape apologist for saying Peyton Manning isn't a sexual predator because he rubbed his junk in someone's face 20 years ago.

[Cj72]

Did I miss something or did Manning only tbag his trainer? I'm sure there are quite a few people who have tbagged someone here. 

[KushMcDieselson]

15 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Oh brother, no person in this country, celebrity or not, rich or poor, is a registered sex offender because they rubbed their dick on someone's face 20 years ago. And for the last f'ing time, I said he probably should have been charged with something assuming that this woman is telling the truth. 

 

Funny how on the Huddle I was a hero for defending Cam's past with the laptop when people kept citing that as a reason not to draft him and mostly a hero for saying Hardy was probably not guilty (until I researched more and determined he was absolutely guilty), but I'm a rape apologist for saying Peyton Manning isn't a sexual predator because he rubbed his junk in someone's face 20 years ago.

Well since we are being all technical huddle lawyers about the difference between rape and sexual assault, otherwise known as "sexual battery", in Tennessee where the crime occurred, it took all of 30 seconds on Google to define sexual battery as "when someone compels a victim to engage in unlawful sexual contact against the victims will", which is a class E felony, pushinable by a fine of up to $3000, at least one (and up to 6) years in prison, or both. It is also an offense that can require registering as a sexual offender in Tennessee.

And I for one am not calling you a "rape apologist", as much as I am calling you a dumbass for acting like what he did isn't a big deal.  Yes, you've stated he should have been charged, but you are still acting like its not a big deal, because hey Cam bought a stolen laptop and you defended him too, because people change.

I am of the opinion that if you are enough of a piece of poo in the past to commit any sort of sexual assault against someone, it doesn't really matter how long ago it was, you're still a piece of poo, and a lot of people would probably agree with me.