Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Kalil to be cut?


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

Would be very interesting to see if Carolina would want to sign him.  Team him up with big brother.  Could move him to RT.  Didn't Remmers come from the Viking stable.   Maybe their O-line coach sucks and he would do much better under Matsko.

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/02/25-big-names-who-could-end-up-nfl-cap-casualties-this-offseason-contracts-robert-griffin-iii-mario-williams#

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are a few interesting names on that list. I have a feeling Gettleman is really going to work his magic this offseason and our roster will look even nastier by the time next season comes around. We already have a talent packed roster, and we have 20 million dollars under the cap right now, before any moves or anything like that. It is fuging on people. The NFL is not going to know what hit them. The dominance will only continue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Don't see it happening. Would YOU want to play alongside your much better brother when you were supposed to be much better than him?

You can look at it that way or you can look at it that Big Bro knows Lil Bro better than anyone. 

Look at what we did with Oher.  Why couldn't the same thing happen with M. Kalil. 

At minimum I hope we bring him in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

Don't see it happening. Would YOU want to play alongside your much better brother when you were supposed to be much better than him?

.....alternatively it might have always been his dream to play for a Superbowl contending team much less play with his closet friend growing up.....you know just a stab in the dark 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SOJA said:

.....alternatively it might have always been his dream to play for a Superbowl contending team much less play with his closet friend growing up.....you know just a stab in the dark 

Ya Think.....  Seriously he was such a high valued OT coming out of college.   He wouldn't be the first OT to be a bust.   Sometimes those around you make you worse than what you actually are. 

His brother is a Pro Bowler and we have one of the best O-Line Coaches in the Game along with Ray Brown.   That would be a definite upgrade for Matt.  Worst thing he can say is NO.

You know the pedigree of being from a good family is there.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...