Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A little change of pace...


PanthersAlv

Recommended Posts

Ok, now I know the Panthers sucked donkey nutz last week in the opener...

The hate is flowing free and rapidly at an consistent 99% "hate rate" towards Jake.

The Defense was better than expected I guess, but, still have room for improvement.

BUT... think for a moment (I know it's hard but try)

"What if" the Panthers come out Sunday in ATL and show up... the Run game happens well, Jake is on, the Defense gets a couple Rips or an INT... and the Panther WIN.

What will you then think?

I mean, we all know there are things that need to be addressed, but, now it's gonna have to wait until next season sadly.

We have what we have. "What if" next week we see the team we expected to see with 20 of 22 returning starters and a new Defense, rejuvenated?

Just asking, to see if there are ANY positive thinkers out there at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is how do we scheme against a strong pass rushing attack, like the Cowboys, maybe the Redskins DLine (depending if they are consistent), the Pats and Giants down the road... If our Oline is inconsistent throughout the season, I'm guessing it'll have to do with those type of defenses and the staff running them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, now I know the Panthers sucked donkey nutz last week in the opener...

The hate is flowing free and rapidly at an consistent 99% "hate rate" towards Jake.

The Defense was better than expected I guess, but, still have room for improvement.

BUT... think for a moment (I know it's hard but try)

"What if" the Panthers come out Sunday in ATL and show up... the Run game happens well, Jake is on, the Defense gets a couple Rips or an INT... and the Panther WIN.

What will you then think?

I mean, we all know there are things that need to be addressed, but, now it's gonna have to wait until next season sadly.

We have what we have. "What if" next week we see the team we expected to see with 20 of 22 returning starters and a new Defense, rejuvenated?

Just asking, to see if there are ANY positive thinkers out there at all.

Jake will probably rebound and play good in the majority of the games this year. But I can guarantee you he will probably at least lose us 3 more games and up to 5 more by himself (reasonably). If you can live with that then so be it but personally I think Matt even with his lack of experience will not lose you that many. Its sad that that is all we expect of the QB now is to not lose games but it has come to that.

I also think Matt would give this team the shot in the arm it needs. And who knows it could be just what Jake needs to get back on track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My concern is how do we scheme against a strong pass rushing attack, like the Cowboys, maybe the Redskins DLine (depending if they are consistent), the Pats and Giants down the road... If our Oline is inconsistent throughout the season, I'm guessing it'll have to do with those type of defenses and the staff running them...

The good thing is we have a talented group. If we didn't I'd be really worried. I think the team as a whole does well Sunday. I think it's the same team we had last year a 12-4 season. They'll get even better as the season goes on. If Jake is gonna fvck up or the line or lines it's better they learn in their first game. I'll go down in flames as an optimist if not.

The Falcons will get upset this Sunday. Vegas will love it. The Cardiac Cat's will rise again.

HOME OF THE NFC SOUTH CHAMPIONS

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We saw the drop off when we had a David Carr or Testaverde. Jake is a little better than having those guys and that's not as easy to come by as we think. There aren't thirty Tom Bradys out there. I can remember when we didn't have Delhomme and kind of wish he was there. Next season we went 12-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have what we have. "What if" next week we see the team we expected to see with 20 of 22 returning starters and a new Defense, rejuvenated?

Nice "Foxism" you slipped in there. :D

I, for one, expect a different Panther team Sunday. A pissed off team on a mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we rebound and play well this week it will underline how hysterical many folks have been. If we suck the din will grow much louder. In any even it won't stop the haters. They will simply keep predicting gloom and doom until the next poor game we have and they will be in full force for another week.

I expect this is going to be a long season no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for Moore the reason he won't be the starter is that he doesn't make all the reads and call the audibles. Sure he went 2-1 with a very pared down simplistic gameplan. But he hasn't shown he can run the full offense or he would be the second string already. If they had faith at all that he could run the offense they would have surely not put McCown on IR and brought in Feeley. Whether you like it not, Moore won't start unless Jake gets hurt and Feeley can't play or stinks it up himself. Otherwise he is our third stringer and will likely get replaced next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As for Moore the reason he won't be the starter is that he doesn't make all the reads and call the audibles. Sure he went 2-1 with a very pared down simplistic gameplan. But he hasn't shown he can run the full offense or he would be the second string already. If they had faith at all that he could run the offense they would have surely not put McCown on IR and brought in Feeley. Whether you like it not, Moore won't start unless Jake gets hurt and Feeley can't play or stinks it up himself. Otherwise he is our third stringer and will likely get replaced next year.

Last year we all knew that Dwills biggest weakness was his pass protection. He did pretty good last year (not so much against the eagles). If that's his biggest weakness put him in with the ones and devote as much time as you need to get him ready.

You know Jake kinda reminds me of an old car. One thats a POS but you keep working on it and working on it. Before long you have a ton of time and money invested in a car that in the end leaves you stranded. Well he's left me stranded far to many times. Its time for us to finally put the tag on the new model and take him out for a test spin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year we all knew that Dwills biggest weakness was his pass protection. He did pretty good last year (not so much against the eagles). If that's his biggest weakness put him in with the ones and devote as much time as you need to get him ready.

You know Jake kinda reminds me of an old car. One thats a POS but you keep working on it and working on it. Before long you have a ton of time and money invested in a car that in the end leaves you stranded. Well he's left me stranded far to many times. Its time for us to finally put the tag on the new model and take him out for a test spin.

Okay someone help me out here... outside of the Eagles and Arizona games obviously, I have to go back to 2006 with the monday night eagles game and the bengals game to remember a game Jake has lost for us. And before that, he was more consistent and won many close games for us. He even did it a few times last year. I just have a hard time believing there will be 3 to 5 more losses this season that can be put on Jake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't really like the phrase, "moral victory". I get what's meant by it, but does that mean that if you do the opposite (play poorly but win) it's an immoral victory? 🤔
    • I blame Evero because he is overrated. Vance Joseph created the defense in Denver that he took credit for. Wilks ran the ball down his throat and Darnold had a 103.8 rtg.  Last year we were decent in yards allowed, and horrible in everything else. Only reason? We kept giving up good field position.  He's had his choice of players to bring in since his scheme is so "complicated." Maybe he should stop trying to be so fancy like running Cover 4 on 3rd and 1 earlier and focus on fundamentals like tackling. These years of Eric Washington, Phil Snow, and Evero must have gotten you confused on what a real defense looked like. Go back and watch the McDermott and Wilks years- this dude is sofT.
    • I tried to make it a point in the opening post that I don't think the offense is a finished product. I think we still need more talent at WR, better play calling, catch more consistently, elimate ridiculous penalties,  and be more consistency in scoring points. I'm just saying, they look markedly better than last year imo. They have scored 20 or more in 6 games and 30 or more in 2 games. And that's particularly notable considering they only mustered 10 points and 3 points in first 2 games of this year and they got blanked on 0 points two games in a row to wrap up last season . I'd say that's a market improvement.  I'm not crowning them and saying we have a top 10 offense or anything.  I'm comparing them to themselves in recent history. 
×
×
  • Create New...