Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Replay assistant for SB50, was a Broncos fan


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Kuhndog94 said:

Denver didn't play well enough to win either.

In fact, Denver was outplayed on both sides of the ball. But as Josh Normam said, its hard to beat two teams. 

The Carolina Defense obviously outplayed the Denver Offense.  If you're trying to say the Carolina Offense outplayed the Denver Defense then you didn't watch the game everyone else did.  Saying Denver was outplayed on both sides of the ball is completely out of touch with reality.  

Even if I concede that every one of the calls/ no calls you disagree with were wrong, and that there were no bad calls/ no calls that went against Denver, you can't seriously believe that the officiating was the decisive factor in a game in which Carolina turned the ball over 4 times, in which 7 of their 12 penalties were non-judgment procedure penalties, and in which they had nearly 15 minutes to try and overcome a 6 point deficit and failed.  

9 hours ago, shaka said:

I'm assuming you mean the long punt return and the missed field goal. There was an illegal fake fair catch signal by Norwood

There is absolutely nothing to support this fantasy.

 

8 hours ago, Rocky Davis said:

Isn't it somehow more of an assumption that assuming somebody is married to a female Bronco fan, and who would like to have sexual intercourse with said female Bronco fan, definitely makes them a Bronco fan (albeit a closet one because NFL rules strictly prohibit this #yeahright)?

So it's reasonable to withhold sex from your spouse because they did their job correctly?  I would hate to be married to someone like you...

And btw, the replay assistant has zero, absolutely zero, decision making opportunities in a game.  He could literally have been the owner of the Broncos or the Panthers and had no impact on the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, GetRealPlease said:

So was the replay assistant a Bronco fan, as the thread title suggests, or was it his wife?  Or are you trying to imply a husband and wife are, in fact, one person? 

Were you equally outraged that the Field Judge for the game, someone with much more actual power than a replay assistant, lives in Charlotte?  Where is that thread?

get that pc poo out of here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GetRealPlease said:

So it's reasonable to withhold sex from your spouse because they did their job correctly?  I would hate to be married to someone like you...

And btw, the replay assistant has zero, absolutely zero, decision making opportunities in a game.  He could literally have been the owner of the Broncos or the Panthers and had no impact on the game.

You couldn't figure out my reply to your post was sarcastic?  Damn bro, start wearing boxers or go commando because your underoos are keeping your butt too tight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...