Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JNo - To Tag or Not to Tag?


Rocky Davis

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Let's be real here. Rivera fugged that one up. Norman should have been starting a long time ago. He was too conservative to let him play.

I don't disagree with the notion that Norman was the better player in terms of skills and talents, but his problem was communication, mistakes, and freelancing. Which if you know football those issues, allow for big gains and scoring...Even on a great defense. Remember the Buffalo game? Bene singled a switch, well norman either ignored, missed or wanted to his own thing the call. Result the panthers lost to a eg Manuel lead bills.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JNo could sign a 4 year deal for roughly 45 million with 25 guaranteed. That would be a fair deal and would guarantee he played his best years here and stI'll provide some cap help in year 1.  This would not break the bank at all and not stop us from signing other players. If he doesn't take it some other very good vet corner will give up a decent deal for a possible super bowl ring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, OneBadCat said:

Let's be real here. Rivera fugged that one up. Norman should have been starting a long time ago. He was too conservative to let him play.

Not even close. He didn't play as a starter because he was not willing to stay within the system and play his responsibility instead of free lancing all the time. Plus he shot his mouth off and was very undisciplined.  Once he got the message and did what he was supposed to do he started and shined. This has been discussed ad nauseum. Where have you been???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

Not even close. He didn't play as a starter because he was not willing to stay within the system and play his responsibility instead of free lancing all the time. Plus he shot his mouth off and was very undisciplined.  Once he got the message and did what he was supposed to do he started and shined. This has been discussed ad nauseum. Where have you been???

Yes I have been there for that conversation but I think it's overblown. Norman should have started earlier. Ron had a history of starting vets over fresher talent and to this day he still does to a lesser degree. 

So Norman blew the Buffalo game. Big deal. You could also make the argument Ron blew that game too. He didn't become Riverboat until later that year. Refs also screwed us out of that game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Yes I have been there for that conversation but I think it's overblown. Norman should have started earlier. Ron had a history of starting vets over fresher talent and to this day he still does to a lesser degree. 

So Norman blew the Buffalo game. Big deal. You could also make the argument Ron blew that game too. He didn't become Riverboat until later that year. Refs also screwed us out of that game.

 

And your opinion doesn't trump what Norman himself admitted about why he didn't start.

http://m.gastongazette.com/article/20151007/NEWS/151009085

It isn't being fresher it is making sure they know their responsibilities in our defense in every situation. Experience is as important or more so than being younger.  Rivera has a history of building top notch defenses everywhere he has gone. But let's ignore all that because you don't agree.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

And your opinion doesn't trump what Norman himself admitted about why he didn't start.

http://m.gastongazette.com/article/20151007/NEWS/151009085

It isn't being fresher it is making sure they know their responsibilities in our defense in every situation. Experience is as important or more so than being younger.  Rivera has a history of building top notch defenses everywhere he has gone. But let's ignore all that because you don't agree.

 

Norman is going to tow the line. What else would you expect him to say? Especially if he wanted to play. We started poo CBs over him for years. I'm not saying he didn't free lance too much. But there were times where putting him in could have helped us win vs his liability to screw it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Norman is going to tow the line. What else would you expect him to say? Especially if he wanted to play. We started poo CBs over him for years. I'm not saying he didn't free lance too much. But there were times where putting him in could have helped us win vs his liability to screw it up.

And you know that how? I love people with absolutely no football experience questioning a guy who won coach of the year two of the last three years. So when the player in question admits he had issues, he is just towing the line. no. Just let it go. You  have no credible argument here.  Norman didn't start tbecause the team had to teach him that you either conform to the system or you don't play no matter how much talent you have. The same with Ealy this year. Guys Come out of college with huge egos, they have to be humbled and taught they aren't bigger than the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, panthers55 said:

And you know that how? I love people with absolutely no football experience questioning a guy who won coach of the year two of the last three years. So when the player in question admits he had issues, he is just towing the line. no. Just let it go. You  have no credible argument here.  Norman didn't start tbecause the team had to teach him that you either conform to the system or you don't play no matter how much talent you have. The same with Ealy this year. Guys Come out of college with huge egos, they have to be humbled and taught they aren't bigger than the team.

Yeah well it worked in Madden 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...