Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JNo - To Tag or Not to Tag?


Rocky Davis

Recommended Posts

A response I made in another thread, but I thought worthy of its own discussion:

Absolutely love that he has worked so hard to become one of the top, if not the best, corners in the league, but he will be 29 later in 2016 most likely playing under the tag.

I haven't seen any news about his expectations for a new contract, but we have to be careful with term and money.  What kind of contract would everyone be willing to give to Josh with age/salary cap implications?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gonna have to pay him big (somewhere between 10 and 15mil per year), which is not out of the question, or tag him is what I am thinking.  Either way, I think he'll be a top-five-paid DB for the next three or four years, whether it's as a Panther or something else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love JNo.

He loves being a Panther.

But at the end of the day two big important things are left to consider:

1) He wants to get PAID. Like stupid crazy money that we probably don't have available to him. 

2) He is a great player in our system. I have my reservations with him on how he would do on most other teams however, and that's due to how the defense unit plays as a whole. Which brings me to my point. Let's say he is an above average (not elite like a Sherman) at best.  Theoretically if you plugged another above average CB into our system, wouldn't that person have similar results JNO has had?

With that said, regardless of his future at Carolina, I'd put money on we bring in additional talent via FA and draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At age 28, Josh has to be really realistic about his earning potential.  Now he could sign a 3 year / $40 million with the first two years heavily guaranteed.  If he's tagged, next off season he'll be 29, looking for a 5 year deal that he won't get.  There has been a tendency for good corners to go down hill at 30.  It's a similar situation to running backs.  It's not always true, but Josh has to be realistic.

If the Panthers let him test the open market, some team would throw $15 million a season at him, but chances are they will be a bad team.  Does he want a Super Bowl as part of a great team?  Or does he want to go else where, make some extra cash and hope they can be as good as us?

Part of that is up to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

Gonna have to pay him big (somewhere between 10 and 15mil per year), which is not out of the question, or tag him is what I am thinking.  Either way, I think he'll be a top-five-paid DB for the next three or four years, whether it's as a Panther or something else.

I hope there is some middle ground as I am sure he would rather have a contract than the tag.  

In a majority of situations with smaller market teams, the tag has always seemed to be a negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hotsauce said:

I love JNo.

He loves being a Panther.

But at the end of the day two big important things are left to consider:

1) He wants to get PAID. Like stupid crazy money that we probably don't have available to him. 

2) He is a great player in our system. I have my reservations with him on how he would do on most other teams however, and that's due to how the defense unit plays as a whole. Which brings me to my point. Let's say he is an above average (not elite like a Sherman) at best.  Theoretically if you plugged another above average CB into our system, wouldn't that person have similar results JNO has had?

With that said, regardless of his future at Carolina, I'd put money on we bring in additional talent via FA and draft. 

I have thought about the "system" and have wondered if that has helped JNo, but once our secondary started dropping like flies I watched his coverage and instincts and believe he is an elite corner.  He is more in the mold of Revis rather than Sherman (who, IMHO, dropped a level or two this past year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Rocky Davis said:

I hope there is some middle ground as I am sure he would rather have a contract than the tag.  

In a majority of situations with smaller market teams, the tag has always seemed to be a negative.

I am not a contract lawyer or expert, but If we can get him for 10-12 mil per year, I think that would be the middle ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...