Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ultimate Factor as to why we Win


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

You can talk how our defense will shut Denver out and they just might.

You can talk about Stewart and the Running game or our unheralded WRs.

But the Ultimate factor will be CAM NEWTON

Like Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird. (Yes Old School NBA Fan)

Cam will take over this game.  They talk about his size and all his amazing abilities but they only touch on his ability to carry this team.  Just like when the Giants tied the game up.  They left too much time for Cam.  We all have seen the Video.  Cam didn't say a word but WE ALL KNEW IT WAS GAME OVER and Cam was going to win that game.  He Did.

If it is close Cam will find a way and we will win.    I know many will say my glasses are a tad rosey but I believe that gifted athletes like Cam don't come around very often but when they do.  They rule the world and very few people can stop them.  No one will contain Cam this Sunday.  He is going to show us a new level of Cam Newton.   He'll bring the Trophy home and we all will tell our grandchildren about the first Super Bowl we won with Cam Newton and how he dominated the game.  Watch and See.

IN CAM WE TRUST

CAMVP

Go Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ultimate factor is a complete TEAM game. Everybody has to do their part. Cam can lead the offense, not a single problem. But it's gonna be both sides. If they keep their motto that nobody is too big for the moment, they will win this game. Offense can't make it too hard for defense and the defense can't make it too hard for the offense. They've got to sell out for each other. I think they want it that bad too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it is a team game.   And he couldn't do it without the rest of the cast.

Every generation or so there comes a player that does extraordinary things.  Things that make you say wow.  Things that you never take your eyes off of that player because if you blink you might just miss something amazing. 

Cam is that player.  Downplay the existence if you want but Cam Newton is a once in generation player.   

Ed Dickson TD is all you need to see. That pass was on a rope at mach 3.  ONLY Place to put it.  Cam did.  Or the Olsen TD against Seattle.  One spot and only one spot. Money.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a lesser team Cam would be the difference maker but I'm of the opinion that this team is so complete that even if Cam has an off day the run game and the defense could lead way to victory.

In fact we might be able to win the game if Manning played for us and Cam for the Broncos. and that assessment  speaks volumes on what really wins the game for you........the offensive line......

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...