Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kemba/Kaminsky Trade??


L-TownCat

Recommended Posts

Eh.

If there's real truth to this trade attempt, we're pretty much going to have to unload Kemba somewhere even if it isn't in this trade. The team is already dealing with inconsistency, trying to trade Walker at this point isn't exactly going help with that moving forward.

Kaminsky is someone that Jordan was supposedly really big on, so it makes me wonder about the legitimacy of this trade rumor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This sounds stupid and would kill attendance.   Who knows at this point though.

 

Kemba's contract is looking pretty good at this point and Frank is a freaking rookie.    When we get rid of Jefferson we should have some room to get someone in here.  This makes no sense to me, hope it's a rumor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, carolina-chuck2 said:

MKG brings the defense tho.

id rather put Batum in. That's two expiring contracts for LA if they plans to go after KD. Plus no one knows if he'll stay here or not. 

You can't bring the defense from the bench.  He's not going to last.  He has all-world talent on defense and potential but he's going to be hurt all the time I think.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Y'all really buying some random Bucks fan account's sources?

Not opposed to moving Kemba at all but at this point if we move him I'd want Parker, Middleton, or Greek Freak included in the return. If they want to move Monroe in a salary dump, give them Al and maybe a pick. Otherwise I wouldnt touch him.

The Blake Griffin idea is insane and LA would be stupid to offer it and we would be stupid to turn it down. Short term, Kemba-Batum-Griffin is fighting in the top half of the East instead of hovering around 40 wins or so every year. Long term (if you could re-sign him in two years) Blake would give you that piece to potentially entice Curry to sign here. But again, that deal is so stupid on the Clips part it's a pipe dream at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...