Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Playbook Analyzing Delhomme


Rhys

Recommended Posts

Apparently not all of the hysterical posters on here knew this. Sharpe made sense and said many of the things that those of us that support the Panthers and Jake have been saying.

True, but it's all water on rocks. They won't absorb that any more than anything else people that can think rationally say.

People are dead-set on thinking we'll have a losing season, they're already in panic mode, and to fix that they seem to think it a good move to axe Delhomme Fox and Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea no doubt, same ole same; even topped it off with the typical "he's won carolina alot of games" nonsense. Excuse me media master, the running game is actually responsible for those wins.

For every game he has possibly won us Ill raise you cards & Eagles 09 a oakland and two tampa bays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea no doubt, same ole same; even topped it off with the typical "he's won carolina alot of games" nonsense. Excuse me media master, the running game is actually responsible for those wins.

For every game he has possibly won us Ill raise you cards & Eagles 09 a oakland and two tampa bays.

And I will re-raise you with a Green Bay, New Orleans, Giants (bad kick), a Chicago, Arizona part 1 and a San Diego.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brian Billick has said what I say alot. The offense is not really all that conversative due to the margin for error.

The Panthers are structured in a way to execute and if they don't or they have turnovers, that makes it a tough row to hoe(man I have missed using that cliche')

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just tried a few mock draft simulators and this is the only way lol. Nothing else makes sense. 
    • No, biggest weakness is pass rush, but I don't think there is a blue chip can't miss DE prospect to take at #1 this year, same as with QB.  But beyond that, moving forward, yea WR is a pretty damn big weakness. We have 1 game this season over 224 yards passing and just traded away our best WR (who wasn't going to re-sign here anyways).  That WR no longer on the team was also the only player we've had this year who had over 78 yards receiving in a game.  So again, yea, WR is one of our biggest weaknesses even right now, let alone moving into the future. As I just said in my other post, I love Legette, but he's not going to be a Top 5-10 WR type of guy, Top 15-20 I can see, I think he can be a good #1 WR or an elite #2. After that, what do we have for the future?  Thielen isn't part of it, sure as hell isn't going to be Mingo, and as much as we all like Coker, in no world is Coker as our #2 to Legette as the #1 going be considered as "having weapons" at WR, even with Brooks and Sanders. But put someone like T-Mac into that group, who I genuinely think is going to be a Top 5 WR in this league for a long time, and it changes things.  A Top 5 WR with Legette/Coker as the 2/3, along with Brooks and Sanders, has the potential to be one of the best set of offensive weapons in the league if they reach their potential.  
    • At this range currently he’s probably a day 3 pick, but I think he will rise to day 2.
×
×
  • Create New...