Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What Broncos Fans Are Saying

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

carpanfan96 Veteran

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, tarheels said:

Broncos are 3rd against the run

That might be the most misleading stat headed into SB50. Denver's defense sucked when it went against a top rushing offense. KC x2, Minny combined had 363 yards in 3 games. When they played Minny, another physical rushing attack they got gashed by AP.

 

On top of that, they were fairly awful containing athletic Qb's. 

 

A. Smith 9 for 48 yards

A. Luck 6 for 34 yards

T. Bridgewater 3 for 23 yards

 

None of those are even close to Cam and his rushing ability.

 

Toping that off and adding a stat I posted earlier, the Panther's rushing attack thrives against 3-4 defenses to the tune of 151 yards per game. 

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherking15 Newbie

pantherking15

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, tarheels said:

Broncos are 3rd against the run

Seahawks were 1st in run defense when we played them in the divisional round. Panthers ran for 144 yards. Our running game is non-traditional. It's extremely unique, multidimensional, and dynamic. Coupled with the 6th ranked run blocking (per PFF) and the threat of Cam's downfield strikes, we can impose our will with our smashmouth running game on anyone, including Denver. 

Denver has only faced 2 top 10 rushing teams and got gashed by both: 113 rushing yards give up vs Vikings and 140, 102 rushing yards in 2 games vs Chiefs.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarheels Newbie

tarheels

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, 15 said:

And gave up almost 400 yards to the chiefs and vikings. Our zone read run game is designed to destroy 3-4 defenses like Denver. When are you going to give up?

 

1 hour ago, MadHatter said:

Until they played Top 10 run games...and gave up 150 yards a game in those 3 games.  You FAIL yet again.

3rd against the run is still 3rd against the run.

 interesting.. I point out the Panthers weak schedule and you say thats invalid, a win is a win.

 I point out Denvers run stopping defense and you cherry pick a couple games to say its not true.

 so basically everything the Panthers do well is their advantage and everything the Broncos do well fits right into panthers advantage? interesting bias

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarheels Newbie

tarheels

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, pantherking15 said:

Seahawks were 1st in run defense when we played them in the divisional round. Panthers ran for 144 yards. Our running game is non-traditional. It's extremely unique, multidimensional, and dynamic. Coupled with the 6th ranked run blocking (per PFF) and the threat of Cam's downfield strikes, we can impose our will with our smashmouth running game on anyone, including Denver. 

Denver has only faced 2 top 10 rushing teams and got gashed by both: 113 rushing yards give up vs Vikings and 140, 102 rushing yards in 2 games vs Chiefs.

sometimes an RB runs forward,sometimes the QB runs forward.

 innovative...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tarheels Newbie

tarheels

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, Kuechly59 said:

The Broncos were 2 point favorites jackass.

that everyone assumed and believed would win.

 

jack ass? lol why are you insulting me over  a game that neither of our lives have anything to do with?

who/what are you defending? some pretend bond with players that dont care about you?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, tarheels said:

 

3rd against the run is still 3rd against the run.

 interesting.. I point out the Panthers weak schedule and you say thats invalid, a win is a win.

 I point out Denvers run stopping defense and you cherry pick a couple games to say its not true.

 so basically everything the Panthers do well is their advantage and everything the Broncos do well fits right into panthers advantage? interesting bias

 

You know deep down the the Broncos are going to get rolled.  You state a rush avg stat and then get embarrassed when you are shown the star to be a weak Arguement.  The Denver run defense got exposed EVERY time they played a good run team...that is a fact Corky.

Just stop and go to bed...you are embarrassing yourself.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MadHatter Rookie

MadHatter

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, tarheels said:

that everyone assumed and believed would win.

 

jack ass? lol why are you insulting me over  a game that neither of our lives have anything to do with?

who/what are you defending? some pretend bond with players that dont care about you?

 

He called you a jackass because you are a dimwited jackass....has nothing to do with the game really.  It has to do with the shallow gene pool from which you hatched.

Edited by MadHatter
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherking15 Newbie

pantherking15

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, tarheels said:

sometimes an RB runs forward,sometimes the QB runs forward.

 innovative...

What an underestimating statement. The point is that the defense doesn't know who has the football and that makes them hesitate. Plus, they have to account for one of the best running QBs in the history of the NFL.

56b291f8eb10e_Vid1.gif.34fa9953fff300ae7

56b2907a48bb2_Vid1.gif.8ea6831da0a151825

This was against the #6 run defense by the way.

Responding " sometimes an RB runs forward,sometimes the QB runs forward" to those videos sounds idiotic.

"The first thing that jumps out when you watch Carolina is how diverse the Panthers' run game is. A lot of it is a small selection of concepts (inside zone, power, and counter) with different wrinkles that don't really affect the offensive line (inverted veer is blocked like QB power, but there's a jet sweep read attached; they'll block inside zone, butCam Newton will have a triple option). But even acknowledging that they have a few base plays, they still break out enough plays outside of those concepts (I saw trap and a buck sweep that immediately come to mind) that you have a lot to prepare for. And that's just what they ran in one game where they were up by three scores from about the second quarter on."

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/word-muth/2016/word-muth-panthers-run-game

There's a reason we have rushed for 100+ yards in like 30 straight games. 

Edited by pantherking15
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherking15 Newbie

pantherking15

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, tarheels said:

 

3rd against the run is still 3rd against the run.

 interesting.. I point out the Panthers weak schedule and you say thats invalid, a win is a win.

 I point out Denvers run stopping defense and you cherry pick a couple games to say its not true.

 so basically everything the Panthers do well is their advantage and everything the Broncos do well fits right into panthers advantage? interesting bias

 

You pick and choose facts to fit your nice little convenient narrative. If something doesn't fit, you ignore it or change the topic lol.

Why do you purposely choose to ignore our 31-0 thrashing of the Seahawks (before we went conservative burn the clock mode) and our 49-15 thrashing of the Cardinals (when we stayed aggressive). Who cares about the regular season, even if you think we had a weak schedule. The most recent games against the best competition (2 teams who are probably better than the Broncos) are better examples to analyze.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      This is why it's probably going to be hard to trade down. This draft is fairly light on top tier talent but pretty deep in talent of that next tier down. I don't think there's going to be a lot of teams clamoring to move up and numerous teams might be entertaining moving down. Not a good market to trade down if that's the case. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      And if they can't find a reasonable trade down (I think we would need a 2nd rounder this year bare minimum to make any trade down worth it). I would definitely expect Dan to trade UP for an EDGE or LB in the top half of R2. Just makes too much sense. We also have a plethora of mid round picks to use as ammo. 
    • Hoenheim
      Trading Down Could be a Gold Mine in This Draft!!

      By Hoenheim · Posted

      I don't mean to make this a mock draft thread particularly,  but every time I do a mock I have been investigating the talent that goes off the board between picks 8 and our low 2nd rounder pick 57. There is a gargantuan amount of talent still left on the board in the top half of the 2nd round every time I do one. Losing our original 2nd round pick to the Bears as the last pick of the Bryce trade stings badly .  I'm particularly looking at elite players like Carson Schwesinger (LB), Luther Burden (WR), Matthew Golden (WR), Maxwell Hairston (CB) , Nick Scourton , Landon Jackson, Donavan Ezeraku (all DEs/OLBs) . The sweet spot in this draft really feels like pick 15 to 40 - ish. This is why the Bears should be making bank with this draft. I don't know how realistic a trade down is from 8, but if we could pick up any teams higher 2nd rounder and still grab their 1st? We'd be cooking with gas man.  Say for example we get Tet McMillan at pick 8, if you wait all the way to 57 you stand the chance of not getting any impact pass rushers in this draft. And I don't think this team can afford that.  I'd personally love for them to take a break from drafting wrs in R1 or R2 (i think we've taken one in the top 2 rounds in the majority of the past few years), and stick to repairing the nfls worse defense in history (in terms of total points against iirc, or was it yards? Also included my most recent mock as an example . Don't put too much into the  late round selections lol  
×
×
  • Create New...