Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Remember that time people here called to fire RR?

0115

By 0115,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted

...Its a rarified mixture of coaching, players and philosophy and we have it...stability in that is important...look at the teams in the last several years that are continually in the mix late in the year...what do they have in common? I didnt want Riv fired but was growing impatient...glad the big cat didnt pull the trigger.. Riv knows football, look at his credentials as a player and coach. We have some incredible players and talent that we are getting the max out of and now a GM that can evaluate talent past the first round of the draft. I dont want to utter the 'D' word but we got it goin on and it could be for the duration. 

Unlike past Denver coaches that are riding Donny Foreheads coat tails...i respect manning but his azz is old and its a young mans world.... hes no George Blanda...his days have come and gone...we could crush their azz' in a nutshell if we get to him...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Veteran

Navy_football

Posted
Posted

Ron was a stereotypical defensive head coach. Run the ball, play conservative offense, and let the defense win the game. He's matured into his role as much as anyone on the team. He even just learned last night how to stay aggressive on both sides of the ball, with a big lead. I think he's willing to go outside of his comfort zone, and he's getting better because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...