Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unofficial - Enemy Fan Forums - Arizona Cardinals


Newtcase

Recommended Posts

http://forums.azcardinals.com/showthread.php?70880-Scouting-the-Camthers-Offense

I love this, truly amazing that we see this every single week.  A wall of text breaking down Carolina and we get to the end only to find this....

Quote

Well, first and foremost Cam. He had a hand in 45 TDs…unreal. If the Cardinals can force him into an average or poor game, I think we win. Secondly, Olsen. Dude balls out every week and he must be limited. Figure out a way to keep those two in check and the rest of their team isn’t enough to beat us.

The word is out, stop Cam, double Olsen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cat said:

The full post was pretty good. 

It was better than most.  No mention of Funchess, and he can burn you as well.  I can't recall a single enemy fanbase with any knowledge of how complex our motion, counter, option running is.  They think Cam scrambling and Stewart/Tolbert pounding is the recipe.  Our run designs are nearly impossible to stop because they force defenders into lose/lose situations.  Ultimately, the only way to slow our run down is to commit more defenders and that's when we play action you and Cam finds 9 different guys to catch the ball over the course of the game.  When I see a post that breaks that down properly and doesn't end with stop Cam, double Olsen I'll +1 it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCandyMan said:

Props, though, to this fan for spelling Greg's name right.  It seemed no one on seahawks.net could, but  then again they've only been football fans since 2012 so........

Maybe they should be called the 2012's instead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trying to help those 3 folks who hate this move.    In 2025 2.75 million is basically the new "vet" minimum.    They still need #3 RB and returner, draft could/should be the lane for that.    There's no downside to this move, they could cut with little effect and replace with your chosen rookie.   
    • Is it though? Even looking at just this past year, DK played 3 more games and had 81 more yards than Higgins had, but he also did it on less catches, with DK averaging 15 yards per catch and Higgins with 12.5. Yes, Higgins had 10 TDs to DK's 5, but I'd say that was far less about the WRs than the QBs, seeing as Burrow had 43 TDs (and only 9 INTs) to Geno's 21 TDs (and 15 INTs).  Swap the two of them last year and DK puts up better stats with Burrow as his QB than Higgins did, no doubt about it in my mind. DK has also only missed 3 games in his career, Higgins has missed 5 in each of the last 2 seasons. People here complain about our WR speed (and it's many people's biggest issue with T-Mac in the draft), but Higgins ran a 4.59 40 and DK ran a 4.33. DK has only played one more season than Higgins but he has 1,730 yards and 14 TDs more than Higgins, despite playing with the ghost of Russell Wilson and Geno Smith, while Higgins has had Burrow. To me, there is no debate, DK is a significantly better WR than Higgins.  Give him Burrow as his QB during his career and his numbers would dwarf what Higgins has put up.
    • Thanks to @CarolinaLivin for the Juan-like work!  
×
×
  • Create New...