Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

bawwwwwwwwlllllllllll the field is why we lost fellow seahawks fans


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

lmao reading those boards is a goodamn fuging lollipop sucking gold mine right now. those fuging ass clowns are running in little dipshit hobbit circles holding hands and screaming into each others' bulbous maxwell house-smelling elephantiasis faces about how the goddamn seahawks lost BECAUSE OF THE FIELD.

yeah fug everything it was totally the field, guys, the same field the panthers played on for the same amount of time. it wasn't the stifling interior rush or the great seconadary instincts or anything else. it was just the cheap bastards in the carolinas who didn't plan for it to precipitate.

 

569c399e7acf0_ScreenShot2016-01-17at8.01

 

pathetic little fugs. go home and plan for the draft and drink a frappucino and snort some cocaine and forget your umbrella and listen to the screaming trees or whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I stopped reading when I had to start goggling what some words meant, but I know what you were trying to say.  :) I just read that entire thread.  They really think this is the reason they lost.  They want "standardized fields". Lol. No other league in the united States has standardized fields. It's called home field advantage.  It's called not being prepared.  It's called an excuse!  

I really wanted to create an account but the time it would take to do so on my tablet wasn't worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seattle is the last team that should be complaining about home field advantages. 

Last I heard the "design" of their field makes it so that sound travels directly onto the field, which makes them appear louder than they are compared to traditional stadiums. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

lmao reading those boards is a goodamn fuging lollipop sucking gold mine right now. those fuging ass clowns are running in little dipshit hobbit circles holding hands and screaming into each others' bulbous maxwell house-smelling elephantiasis faces about how the goddamn seahawks lost BECAUSE OF THE FIELD.

 

As I said in that other thread, if you wanted to play on your own field, you needed to win your division.

But you didn't.  So you have to play every playoff game on the road.

So suck it up, Nancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Nomad82 said:

My hatred for the Seahags and their fans will never, ever change.

Same here... moved here 4 years ago from Georgia and have learned to hate them with a passion... 

They had a "Looks like we are going to Arizona" thread posted yesterday.

Now they can choke on their humble pie.

Kudos Carolina... good luck next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
    • I didn't say I would have done it. I was just saying that I can see why some in the FO considered it. Everything was done to give Bryce weapons. Solidify the interior line thru FA. Get XL at WR in round 1 and then get the most talented RB in round 2. Take a TE in round 4, etc They were probably "assuming" he'd make a complete recovery during the 2024 season. I'm a skeptical person. I wouldn't have assumed he'd be ok in 2024. I personally would have taken another position in the 2nd for that very reason. But, if I were "influenced" to take him I would've argued to keep him off the field, especially seeing how things were going for us record wise. Conventional Wisdom says most backs don't get back to normal until two years after the ACL surgery. He was injured in Fall 2023. Having him suit up in 2025 would have been almost 2 years since the original injury. You have him for 3 year on low contract. If he balls out, you resign him for a couple of more years b/c he'd only have 3 years of tread on the tires. If he's ok but not great you let him walk. 
×
×
  • Create New...