Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Arizona or Greenbay?


CamMoon

Recommended Posts

I know, I know it's Seattle week but I honestly think we should but the chickens by 3 touchdowns at a minimum, save divine intervention we should beat Seattle. That said, I'll be rooting hard for Arizona because I want to smash them in the mouth and get revenge for a certain playoff game that sent this team back a half decade. Plus, I would much rather play Carson fuging Palmer than Aaron Rogers every day of the week. KP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's more to football than a QB.  GB's defense is awful, and their run game isn't good.  On the flip side, Zona has an average QB, average RB, and pretty much top tier talent EVERYWHERE else.  Zona is the ONLY team that truly worries me amongst the remaining teams in the playoffs.  We're better, but not by enough that I think we could absorb a negative turnover game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sam Mills Fan said:

I'd prefer the Packers for sure. Once we make the Super Bowl, the easiest team would be the Chiefs. Our roster would WRECK the Chiefs.

The Chiefs are good...DVOA says so!!! Bwahahaha 

yeah, the Chiefs really are good.  But they have Alex Smith.  Alex Smith Alex Smith Alex Smith.  In the Super Bowl.  Would be too good to be true.

image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, JJman Returns said:

fug this easy poo. I want Arizona then New England. Besides honestly I'd rather play Carson Palmer then Aaron Rodgers in the NFCC game. But yea, Seattle now

Yup. I want the hardest possible road. That means roll Seattle on Sunday then obliterate the Cards the next week. And then 2 short weeks after that humiliate the Patriots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First on T-Mac, I 100% expect him to be the top WR from this class, however I think expecting him to put up 1k+ as a rookie isn't necessarily fair, especially since you're putting it in perspective of how many other rookie WRs have done that in recent years. And Thielen is the reason for that. Not many (if any) of those 1k+ rookies had someone like Thielen there when they were drafted, and no matter how good T-Mac is this year, Bryce is still going to lean on his existing chemistry with Thielen unless he's drastically lost a step this offseason and just can't get open like he's been able to in his career. As I pointed out in another thread the other day, looking at MHJ last year is the way to look at T-Mac's season if Thielen plays a full and healthy season.  MHJ had McBride "steal" 110+ catches and 1,100+ yards in what was a pass happy offense (Kyler was 9th in the league in attempts), it's going to be hard for any rookie to put up more than the 800ish yards he had last year in that scenario.  Especially if we follow a similar game plan to last year and be a run heavy team. In terms of XL, you're completely right, jumping up to get a project 2/3 isn't smart, and if we knew we needed a future slot from that pick, yes, Ladd would have been a much better pick. But at this point, those are all sunk costs, even taking T-Mac at 8 is now considered a sunk cost. Forgetting the past or who we maybe should have taken last year now knowing future roles, I still think T-Mac, XL, Coker can be one of the Top 1-3 WR rooms in the NFL in a few years, I honestly think they really do have that potential in them.
×
×
  • Create New...