Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How chippy will it be on Sunday


goodoleboy

Recommended Posts

These teams have a history but it's not like a division rivalry. The last time we had a playoff bye we came out a little overhyped and made some stupid penalties.

Pete Carrols speech yesterday emphasized winning in the 4th quarter.   I want to see fire but controlled fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cary Kollins said:

I think these teams have a healthy respect for one another.

 

I expect a hard, physical game but not too much chippiness.

I love Panther vs Seahawk games, they are physical as  hell but they do respect each other and that keeps it fun to watch. I'd be shocked if it got out of hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

I think these teams have a healthy respect for one another.

 

I expect a hard, physical game but not too much chippiness.

This is my belief too. Our guys don't like theirs, but they respect them. You're gonna see some slobber knockers, and some jawing but I don't think it will be anything other than a very physical football game. 

Also, I'm not really worried about RR "reigning them in". I think Ron knows these guys he knows how they play and what makes them tick. What happened in the Falcons game wasn't Ron pulling them back. If anything it showed him that they needed to be encouraged to play their game, toe the line, just keep it within the spirit of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These games are never that chippy overall.  

Now that 89 isn't here there isn't really a chippy matchup to start it off.   

The only guys that ever went at it were when Sherman and 89 would forget everyone else existed.  None of our WRs play that game and it doesn't appear Seattle's do either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Jimmy Graham not playing I don't think it will be very chippy. He's the only guy that the players were getting into it with in the last matchup aside from that light dust up between Lynch and Luke which was nothing.

None of our WRs are talkers so I wouldn't expect any back forth between them and Sherman. Bennett will yap but nothing will come from that. Baldwin and Norman has some potential but I don't expect them to really be matched up that much. Baldwin and Finnegan is the most likely spot that there would be any fireworks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2016 at 2:10 PM, Bartin said:

With Jimmy Graham not playing I don't think it will be very chippy. He's the only guy that the players were getting into it with in the last matchup aside from that light dust up between Lynch and Luke which was nothing.

None of our WRs are talkers so I wouldn't expect any back forth between them and Sherman. Bennett will yap but nothing will come from that. Baldwin and Norman has some potential but I don't expect them to really be matched up that much. Baldwin and Finnegan is the most likely spot that there would be any fireworks.

Finnegan is no longer coached by Mr. Play After the Whistle Jeff Fisher

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tua has maybe 2 passes further than 5 yards. 
    • I'd give the rookie WR's more credit than that. Bryce did actually earn most his yards against the Chiefs, but that Saints game was all rookie WR's yac. It was probably like 80ish of the 170 total passing yards were yac by JT and Coker. The throws have been accurate though and he's obviously playing with more confidence. I still want to see something over 40 yards in the air at some point that looks good/accurate
    • We’ll agree to disagree.  Maybe change my wording to better roster would have been more accurate. Gamecocks have some nice defensive players….but they are also thinner than Clemson all around.  it’s at Clemson.  Dabo.  Better overall roster.  And they are favored slightly….which essentially supports my prior post that either could win but if you had to pick without a dog in the race Clemson is the smarter pick.   straight up vs Carolina? I trust Clemson’s O more than Carolina’s.    Top 10 vs top 60 with the QB edge.  And Clemson’s D has some real studs on it too.   Which is what Vegas says.   I’ll make my pick game day.  Will depend on who can and can’t suit up for Clemson.  Carolina has been much healthier this year.  But ST could be the difference.  That Louisville game exposed some massive flaws in their kick game.  You don’t really want ST weakness showing itself vs Beamer 
×
×
  • Create New...