Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Third down conversions by opponents


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Did some research and the Panthers come in at fourteen amongst all the teams. I was suprised at this stat. Seems like they spend half the game giving up third downs. Wish I had an answer to improve this stat (better pass rush, better personal, defensive scheme, etc). Need to tighten this up somehow before we hit the big games if possible. Being in the middle of the pack isn't terrible, but wouldn't hurt to improve with the teams we will be facing.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo it seems like we don't win many 3rd and shorts on defense, or 3rd and goal. Our run d is soft up the middle far too often at least compared to what I've seen in past seasons...might just be because I remember the bad parts tho lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, minicho said:

Imo it seems like we don't win many 3rd and shorts on defense, or 3rd and goal. Our run d is soft up the middle far too often at least compared to what I've seen in past seasons...might just be because I remember the bad parts tho lol. 

If I was going by my eye test I would actually say 3rd and long is our weakness. I feel much better about 3rd and 5 or 6 than I do about 3rd and 10 or 12. It always seems we give up the 3rd downs that seem to be the easiest to defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with BretWeed, seems like we give up 3rd and long at a ridiculous rate sometimes and esp in the last 4-5 games it seemed to get worse.  

It's been noted elsewhere but our pass rush progressively got worse over the season, they really need to rectify this for us to have more defensive success in the playoffs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's our pass rush. It's not getting to the QB for sacks or even hurries. It seemed to get worse when Charles Johnson came back. I think Ealy and Delaire were getting more pressure than Johnson. I hope we get this fixed before next week!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think this is a characteristic of our "bend-but-don't-break" approach to our cover 2 zone defense. We allow a lot of yardage between the 20s but force field goals instead of td's. Then, when we do force a punt, we convert the possession into a score, sometimes very quickly (td bombs to ginn). This results in the opposing team getting the ball back, playing from behind and taking more chances, resulting in more conversions. Our D in 2013 was "better" statistically because we played more ball control/TOP on offense, giving the opposing team less possessions.

This kind of defense is also why we can survive with the "next man up." Our D is successful when everyone is in their gaps/zones, not just because of defensive superstars. That way, when one of our superstars goes down (Luke) the next man up can fill in and we survive (AJ Klein).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another factor is that when you are leading in every game, many times by a large margin, the other team is forced to be much more aggressive throwing the ball.  There hasn't been a game all season where the other team was just trying to run out the clock or otherwise sitting on the ball, because they are always behind.  That means the defense gets relatively few possessions where they aren't getting the offenses best shot.  Thats also a reason we have allowed so many 4th down conversions.  Teams are desperate to score and are being forced to go for it instead of punting.  Opponents never do that kind of thing when they are leading.  Thats not making excuses for the defense because we have been lousy on third down for a variety of reasons, but maybe it isn't quite as bad as it looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two great points above me!

But we will have to tighten things up in the playoffs.  We HAVE to get the other guys off the field, and we have to run the ball and score TDs.  That overused, simple formula is the key to our success this year, except we've had a lot of 3rd downs converted.

The reason we're 15-1 though is because we've caused more turnovers than anyone else and we've score a large portion of our points off those turn overs.  We're trying to prevent a deep, quick score, and force mistakes to create turnovers.  When we don't, they have tended to drive fairly well.

Think about how many of these drives we saw this season: Opponent takes over at their 20, they end up driving to our 40 or so with 2-3 conversions, then on that final one, they have to punt or try a long field goal (or turn the ball over!).  2/3 or 3/4 is really high, but they don't come away with points at the end of the day (unless you have a QB and roster that can attack our nickle CB....)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...