Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Shula goes....who you want?


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Hes not going this season, so its really the last thing on my mind. 

 

But, i hope its in house to keep this Cam train rolling. I want a 20 year Rivera Dynasty with a huge coaching tree stemmin from him. 

 

Hire Dorsey. Knows Cam, has been around to see first hand in live action and in practice how it works and how much success it has. Cam is a smart guy, if he continues to progress he can be like an OC in the huddle. No need to fug poo up with another outside guy and system. Its not like Shula is brilliant..

 

with cam, it is 100% concrete to me that cam can put together a 15-1 NFL season with a solid Oline and a bunch of #3/4 recievers (although Funchess will griw to be a co #1 WR)

 

Dorsey. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

Neither Dorsey and Proehl have enough experience to be OC. Then again, Cam has made Shula look like a genius. Sooooooo...

What is this dumb meme that keeps getting repeated?

Every single offensive coordinator calls his first play one time. It's not like Shula's previous experience of getting poo canned wherever he was would instill any smart person with confidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Lemory said:

Shula wont get hired as a HC. He might interview, but thats about it. 

I don't know, people like big names and he has that, even if he didn't earn it. Also, Bama is as big as it gets in College and he impressed enough to get that job. Now, he has quite a bit more experience, than when he got the Bama job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...