Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Jan 17 1:00


goodoleboy

Recommended Posts

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, goodoleboy said:

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Icebox said:

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Who is to say its tougher for us? The teams that couldn't get it done in their division have to play on the road. The only change to the NFC wildcard seeding would be Green Bay would play Washington at home if they seeded your way. Everything else stays the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

We have Home Field throughout. How could anyone whine about that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
    • This was evident first two weeks of season. I don’t see any issues with physical tools since he came back. I think he is a player that must play with confidence to overcome those size limitations and he’s doing that.  
    • Still 3-10 on passes over 15 yards.  At least he's not scared to merely attempt them anymore.  Where I see improvement is the 10-15 yard range.  He was 6-6.  Bryce of old was scatter shot on anything beyond 10 yards and the further out, the worse the accuracy.
×
×
  • Create New...