Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sunday Jan 17 1:00


goodoleboy

Recommended Posts

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, goodoleboy said:

I enjoyed our playoff game last year. They don't need to fix what isn't broken.

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Icebox said:

I did, too, but just because it helped us one year doesn't mean that it makes any sense. Why should the team that performs best in the regular season get rewarded with a *tougher* road to the Super Bowl? What is the logic in that?

Who is to say its tougher for us? The teams that couldn't get it done in their division have to play on the road. The only change to the NFC wildcard seeding would be Green Bay would play Washington at home if they seeded your way. Everything else stays the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Icebox said:

The playoff seeding system is complete B.S. When the lowest division winner is the worst team to make the playoffs in a conference (which is often the case), the advantage for the one seed is often nil.

Division winners should get in, but seeding and home-field should be based on record.

We have Home Field throughout. How could anyone whine about that?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know about you but I have been a life long Chiefs fan for the past 4 years.
    • Sure there's a ton of transplants in Colorado now. But as far as Denver in particular goes the Broncos have also been around for 65 years. Someone moving to Denver is going to be far more likely to become a fan of the Broncos and even attend games versus someone moving to Charlotte and the Panthers. Like I said it's not just one single thing with us it's multiple factors.
    • He's definitely getting better. It's fun to watch.  I've been getting killed for this take, but with the current state of college football, it just takes more time to develop a quarterback. I don't think it's a plug and play position anymore. I'm really not sure if it ever was. NFL offenses have always been substantially more complex than the college game, and the college game has simplified even more in recent years. Many college teams do not have a physical playbook anymore. That's just not the national football league.  Are there freaks who have success from day 1? Yes, without question. But so many of those guys are runners, and so many of those guys tail off. Is Bryce ever going to be Josh Allen? Probably not.  What I am seeing is a guy with complete command of the offense. He's checking into things at the line, making adjustments, and making timely throws.  He goes to David Moore a ton, because Moore is a consistent route runner. Bryce knows where he is and when he should be open. I think the guy with the "super processor" needs to be comfortable in the offense in order to do the "super processing." He doesn't have elite arm talent, and he is small of stature, but if he makes the smart play consistently, and he's willing to throw the ball downfield and not make mistakes, like he's starting to show, he's going to be a starter for a long time in this league, and it's not a position I'd spend draft capital right now. 
×
×
  • Create New...