Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can we win without Kemo?


CAPantherFan

Recommended Posts

I think we can win without Kemo. We shut down the #1 offense in the league and made them look silly without him so I think we can do it again. Vincent is gonna hurt us though cause he is one hell of a run blocker and really we dont have any great at the G pos to replace him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the beauty of this team.....we have DEPTH. KEMO will be missed if he doesn't suit up, but he's further down the list when sweating an injury. I think we'll be fine.

Sorry man, but Kemo will be more than "missed" if he doesn't play. Big guys like Kemo keep offensive lineman from getting to the second level and blocking linebackers.

I am going to the church to pray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mentioned in the other thread that we don't have a true "nose guard" type other than Kemo on the defensive line. The guys backing him up are more tradional '3 technique' style DTs.

As is, a lot of the scheming depends on Kemo's ability to occupy a couple of blockers on run downs. For the record, it isn't absolutely necessary to have sheer bulk to be able to do this. There are guys like Greg Kragen who manage to do it without being huge.

That kind of guy is, however, rare. And I can't honestly say I look at any of our current backups and see "that guy". If they are, Sunday night will be their chance to show it. If not, we'll have issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting to me that people were talking about what a waste Kemo was in the past and now we have to have him to win.

I really think we need to play a 5 man line against the Giants. Without great receivers and an ability to put us in the nickle we should consider putting Davis up and let Harris fill that spot especially on running downs. It allows us to use a more 1 gap rush instead of 2 gap like we do with Kemo and keep linemen from getting to Beason. If they go to 3 receiver sets or use a lot of tight end passing formations then back him out and put Harris in coverage. But Dallas showed us that their receivers can't get separation in tight man coverage and that Eli isn't all that accurate. He also fades under pressure. We need to shoot the gaps which turns into a pressure look like a blitz on play action or if they throw the ball. Manning has not gone deep that often so we should not fear the long ball. I think we need to play physical and pressure them as Dallas and Philly did the past 2 weeks. Both of them have shown that it is a formula that works against the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting to me that people were talking about what a waste Kemo was in the past and now we have to have him to win.

I really think we need to play a 5 man line against the Giants. Without great receivers and an ability to put us in the nickle we should consider putting Davis up and let Harris fill that spot especially on running downs. It allows us to use a more 1 gap rush instead of 2 gap like we do with Kemo and keep linemen from getting to Beason. If they go to 3 receiver sets or use a lot of tight end passing formations then back him out and put Harris in coverage. But Dallas showed us that their receivers can't get separation in tight man coverage and that Eli isn't all that accurate. He also fades under pressure. We need to shoot the gaps which turns into a pressure look like a blitz on play action or if they throw the ball. Manning has not gone deep that often so we should not fear the long ball. I think we need to play physical and pressure them as Dallas and Philly did the past 2 weeks. Both of them have shown that it is a formula that works against the Giants.

Denver went pretty much 4-4 (with a safety in Siberia) against us, It didn't work because we had Steve Smith.

Shared name aside, none of the Giant receivers is Steve Smith. Still, how comfortable do we feel putting our corners on an island?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denver went pretty much 4-4 (with a safety in Siberia) against us, It didn't work because we had Steve Smith.

Shared name aside, none of the Giant receivers is Steve Smith. Still, how comfortable do we feel putting our corners on an island?

Denver's 4-4 was not an attacking defense but a contain defense which didn't blitz that much. If we can get pressure on Eli then they won't be stranded on an island. A lot of our confusions this year have been in zone coverage when we transistion receivers from short zone to deep zone with the safeties making poor reads. By putting the corners in coverage primarily you avoid that but have to be stout against the run since the DBs have their back to the ball or play. Hence the need for a 5 man line. So for me it wouldn't be a 4-4 as much as 5-2 or 4-3 depending of situation and circumstance. If their receivers start catching balls then we will have to adjust which is something Denver didn't do. But if we are going to get pressure we will have to rush at least 5 to get pressure. Without Kemo to occupy 2 blocks it means they can double other folks and bust open a hole or keep Peppers at bay.

But I am sure it is all speculation since we will likely play a bend don't break defense again this week that hopefully won't make Eli look all world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...