Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Feel like we were exposed, not a real thread - talk me down


Recommended Posts

I have watched all year; have felt all year Arizona is the better team, that we peaked too soon; really feeling naked about my most beloved sports team heading into the playoffs. 

Really need someone to talk me down from the ledge. I feel like it is a virtual guarantee we lose to Arizona in the playoffs, given that we make the NFCC. It will kill me if this team after such a great season; doesn't make the super bowl. 

To be fully honest, we haven't really beaten anyone. We lack quality wins. We have played a soft schedule. When cam isn't super human like today, we're pretty pedestrian. I don't know... Anyone else feeling this way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This team has blew it's load already.. I have a terrible feeling about the playoffs. If we make it to the NFCC game I'm 99% confident we lose to the Cardinals..

We are trending in the wrong direction. Our D is checked out and frankly aren't even that good when they aren't checked out, Cam has baby brain and is distracted and will continue to be so. Hell even Kuechly looks checked out..

And we are still 1-4 after a bye under Rivera, I'm about 50% sure we lose the divisional round and 99% sure we won't make the SB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DeeJay said:

Just shut up you fairweather fan

You don't care about this team, we had ONE BAD GAME jeeze

Two bad games in a row. Blowing a 20 plus point lead last week and getting beat this week.. We are still suspect after a bye, this team has epic Cardinals/Delhomme type playoff loss written all over it.. Buckle up, that divisional game could be ugly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd give it a C mainly because of Brooks.  If we just didn't have a 2nd I'd argue B to B+ tbh. Brooks was a bad gamble, tho one that could still pay off long term. Yes XL only has 400 yards but... Look who is throwing him the ball. And I think he isn't a "true #1" but he's been able to consistently get open. Hands definitely need to be cleaned up.  But he should end the year with 500-600 yards. Like you said - Sanders looks great.  Get him a better QB / more time with a QB and I think he's gonna impress. We added a couple rotational players on D that have both made plays and show promise for the future from later rounds. So I'd say, Brooks really hurts this drafts grade. It'll be interesting to see how it progresses over the next 3 years. I've overall really liked Morgan's FA acquisitions, so...
    • Oh he would absolutely flourish. It’s the panthers way. It’s no different with coaches. Sometimes they reach their expiration date, go somewhere else, and find new success.  Similarly to Burns, how long to wait for the light to finally turn on?  Market forces will demand a salary that the panthers can not responsibly match. Sliding him to guard will fit his skill set better, but he has played LT for 3 years. He will receive offers from other teams wanting to pay him LT money.  At guard, he won’t start with what they have paid Hunt and Lewis. Center then?? Dunno. Maybe? He will become a backup by default once they draft their stud LT. I doubt Dan just stands pat. That’s not his MO.  So where does this put him? Can you match what other teams will offer for a backup LT/guard? Do you dish out franchise LT $ on a guy who still needs significant improvement in pass protection. This team will be DOA in the playoffs with the very first team who has a formidable speed rusher. What if he has hit his ceiling in pass protection already and they sign him long term? It’s a big gamble either way. 
    • We're in a great position to see just how big of a misstep it would be, having made so many ourselves
×
×
  • Create New...