This Says It All

[Sam Mills Fan]

LOL at this thread.

I see that Monday night is when the Jake slurpers come out to play on the Huddle.

Congratulations guys. You support Jake. Just like every Falcon, Saint, Buc fan out there. They too support Jake and want him to remain our quarterback for as long as possible. 11 turnovers in 2 games speaks for itself.

Oh but I forgot. He's a NICE GUY and people LIKE HIM and he has a FIERY ATTITUDE and amazing LEADERSHIP ABILITIES and he ANSWERS REPORTERS' QUESTIONS and is a STANDUP GUY with CHARISMA. All of which are qualities much more important than delivering an accurate pass to a receiver on your own team.

[Panther Boyd]

iF THE team is behind him, then dammit I AM TOO.

I dont get the info they have, or know what they know, so I will follow their lead.

I am not a coach, player, or GM.

I am a fan.

its my job to stick with my team, when its great and when its bad.

Dont forget THE REASON people are pissed is because this team IS A GOOD TEAM....

1 game is not going to define who we are...

Thats what SEASONS are for...

:cheers2:

[Panther Boyd]

It pains me to see this happening to our team. I have, and always will be, a Jake fan. Let us not forget he has led us to two NFC Championship games and a Super Bowl. However, the last two games have been atrocious for him. Sunday, the first pass was tipped when it was intercepted. If it was all of Jakes fault, then our RB's should've had more yards (I think a little over 70 yards combined) but obviously they struggled too.

If it is Jakes time to go, or become a back up, I wish Panther fans would treat the situation with a little class instead of personal bashing. I myself am guilty of this because I was one of those that attacked Peppers in the off season.

If it is Jakes time I thank him for his loyalty and class. Otherwise I want him on the field to represent the team that I love.

[PantherDude]

:cheers2:

I cheer to that too.

[goncrazi]

LOL at this thread.

I see that Monday night is when the Jake slurpers come out to play on the Huddle.

Congratulations guys. You support Jake. Just like every Falcon, Saint, Buc fan out there. They too support Jake and want him to remain our quarterback for as long as possible. 11 turnovers in 2 games speaks for itself.

Oh but I forgot. He's a NICE GUY and people LIKE HIM and he has a FIERY ATTITUDE and amazing LEADERSHIP ABILITIES and he ANSWERS REPORTERS' QUESTIONS and is a STANDUP GUY with CHARISMA. All of which are qualities much more important than delivering an accurate pass to a receiver on your own team.

Continue to place an entire game's worth of poor coaching, poor blocking, and poor decision-making on one guy. Overlook the 24 points that the defense gave up, short field or not. Dismiss the seven points our special teams gave up (or more accurately, the seven points the NFL awarded the Eagles for signing Vick). Forget that none of our backup QBs were any more effective than Jake. Do all of that, not because it's truth, but because it's the chic thing to do, it's an easy way out. LOL at you.

[PantherDude]

LOL at this thread.

I see that Monday night is when the Jake slurpers come out to play on the Huddle.

Congratulations guys. You support Jake. Just like every Falcon, Saint, Buc fan out there. They too support Jake and want him to remain our quarterback for as long as possible. 11 turnovers in 2 games speaks for itself.

I dare you to say that to Gross, Smith, & others of his supporters on the team. In fact, say it to their face, bub. So....are they like Falcons, Saints, & Bucs fans too for sticking up for him? Wow, you're full of it. But then, some are too angry to think straight.

[KillerKat]

Continue to place an entire game's worth of poor coaching, poor blocking, and poor decision-making on one guy. Overlook the 24 points that the defense gave up, short field or not. Dismiss the seven points our special teams gave up (or more accurately, the seven points the NFL awarded the Eagles for signing Vick). Forget that none of our backup QBs were any more effective than Jake. Do all of that, not because it's truth, but because it's the chic thing to do, it's an easy way out. LOL at you.

What about the free 14 points Jake gave up. He hurt the team by trying to be cute instead of holding on to the ball and taking the sack. The defense actually looked pretty good. Its hard to ask them to continally stop the opposing offense when you're own offense is turning the ball over on a consistent basis. LOL @ U!

[goncrazi]

What about the free 14 points Jake gave up. He hurt the team by trying to be cute instead of holding on to the ball and taking the sack. The defense actually looked pretty good. Its hard to ask them to continally stop the opposing offense when you're own offense is turning the ball over on a consistent basis. LOL @ U!

Well, hell. There's our answer...

Somebody get Drew Bledsoe on the phone!!!!

You're a freakin' genius. Somebody tell Hurney we've found our next GM/Coach!

[Sam Mills Fan]

Steve Smith did not exactly give Jake a ringing endorsement and Brad Hoover CERTAINLY did not.

[KillerKat]

Well, hell. There's our answer...

Somebody get Drew Bledsoe on the phone!!!!

You're a freakin' genius. Somebody tell Hurney we've found our next GM/Coach!

Nah, you're right. It's perfectly fine for a QB to give opposing teams free points plus more turnovers and expect the Defense not to be worn out as a result. You're a real Einstein.

[goncrazi]

Nah, you're right. It's perfectly fine for a QB to give opposing teams free points plus more turnovers and expect the Defense not to be worn out as a result. You're a real Einstein.

Tell me, oh wise one: When did the Eagles time of possession surpass the Panthers' time of possession?

Here's a hint: It was well after the Panthers lost control of the game. If the Panthers defense was more worn out than the Eagles D at that point, then it goes back to conditioning.

[KillerKat]

Tell me, oh wise one: When did the Eagles time of possession surpass the Panthers' time of possession?

Here's a hint: It was well after the Panthers lost control of the game. If the Panthers defense was more worn out than the Eagles D at that point, then it goes back to conditioning.

Ball Posession For the Eagles:

One time, CAR 32 (Because of INT)

Another, CAR 9 (Because of INT)

Another, CAR 10 (Because of INT)

Another, CAR 42 (Because of INT)

Another, CAR 47 (Because of Fumble - Where it was fumbled)

So I guess you're gonna blame the Defense because of that right?

[goncrazi]

You didn't answer my question. Nice evasion tactic.

[KillerKat]

You didn't answer my question. Nice evasion tactic.

Eagles Time of Posession: 31:27

Panthers Time of Posession: 28:23

You said the Eagles had more TOP after the Panthers game was out of reach, so you're putting blame on them cause of that? You got to take in consideration the field position for the Eagles as well. If not, you're only being ignorant. They played well under the circumstances. Oh and nice evasion of my point that supports the Defense.