Ok, these headphones are nice.

[Mojo]

Bluetooth doesn't "ruin" the quality.  It's a slight degradation with a good pair.  I mix over bluetooth all the time.  Unless you're doing critical eqing and sound shaping it's really not a huge deal and most people wouldn't even notice, especially if you're listening to already compressed file types. (like eazy e mentioned above). I'm pretty sure he's not listening to raw wav or aif files so it's an exaggeration.

[Doc Holiday]

Bose > Beats

[L-TownCat]

You guys make it sound like you'd spit in a persons face if they dared purchase a certain brand.... Lol.  

Ugh, BEATS!!!  Stone the savage until he learns.

[Lumps]

It's not because it's a certain brand it's because it's a fad, not a real product hence the rediculous price but more importantly the competition having a much better product. But people see it everywhere on stars and with fancy style and who gives a fug about quality, as long as they look cool and are 'in'.

 

Some people just don't grow out of that phase...

 

Lol @ beats being nice headphones.

[PanthersATL]

6 hours ago, KSpan said:

Beats do a good enough job of that already.

And 1/3 the weight of Beats headphones are useless metal parts designed only to add weight to the product (and still only cost about $16 to make)

https://blog.bolt.io/how-it-s-made-series-yup-our-beats-were-counterfeit-but-they-cost-about-the-same-to-make-as-the-364cc6808d18#.sk3c4myuj

[countryboi]

trying to work out with wires is hell.....its worth the loss in sound quality not have your headphones ripped out while doing squats..

[carolinahiatt]

Beat my 10 dollar skull candy's.  I'd rock them if I could