Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ is a class act

FutureDynasty

By FutureDynasty,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Lumps Newbie

Lumps

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, thebigcat said:

you are confusing CJ the person for CJ the player....

 

From what I have read, CJ the person is an awesome and funny dude

From what I have seen on the field, CJ the player is not playing up to his contract stature 

Our fan base really doesn't understand the difference, it's so sad. Barring extremes (see Hardy, Rice etc.) charity work and all this other bullshit is none sense to me.

 

im a big 'good person fan', and where I go to find those heroes....isn't the NFL, and it's sad to think anyone does. 

 

who gives a fug, he's overpaid and needs to be dropped from the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Semaj Newbie

Semaj

Posted
Posted

CJ is having a down year thus-far, but lets not forget all the years that he was a huge part of its success.  He still has time to be a major impact at the crucial moment of a crucial game.  Maybe he will get the sack that will win the Super Bowl?  I think that its premature to give up on him at this time and we should remember all that he has done on the field over the years.  Hope he gets its going and puts the talk about his on field production to bed.  Lastly I think its great that he did that nice gesture for families in the Charlotte community.    How can anybody act like it doesn't matter because it definitely mattered to the families lives that he touched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...