Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This won't make you happy, but I've got to do it.


ThinkAboutIt

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, ThinkAboutIt said:

... but the fact remains, Norman "started it" when he picked up Beckham and slammed him during the Giants' first possession, and you could tell Beckham was surprised by it. 

Doesn't change the fact that he lost it, but he clearly didn't enter the game planning to leave it hating Norman.

Actually, you are wrong. Beckham started it and be sure to send these frames to anyone saying otherwise.

aax6w1.jpg

Quick screen grabs.

1. Odell initiates a block during a running play by grasping Norman's shed arm and delivering a hay maker under the chin of Norman sending Norman backward.

2. Odell follows through with the forearm to the throat.

3. Odell throws his body up and on Norman pushing his head backward with the forearm.

4. Odell initiates a head lock on Norman with the forearm pushing on the throat of Norman and his opposite arm wrapped around the back of Norman's neck with Odell's body weight directed at the throat of Norman.

5. Odell refuses to release the choke hold on Norman.

6. Odell releases the choke hold and begins to look for the official. Norman also releases his hold with his right arm to push Odell away.

7. Odell wraps his arms around Norman locking him up while looking for the official. This traps Norman's released arm while trying to push Odell away.

8. Odell makes eye contact with official and releases his hold while leaning his body on Norman.

Then Norman tosses Odell to the ground.

So, blow to the the head, forearm to the throat, choke hold with full body weight, and then body slam.

Now I ask you, who started it?

You would need a punch count for this game to track how many times Beckham went to Norman's face, throat, chin, mouth, and temple. Odell was doing this to Finnegan as well in the game. It was definitely his game plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me make sure I understand this, so pushing someone down means they get to punch, put hands in the facemask, and launch themselves into someone's head from 15 yards behind the play???

I'm glad Norman didn't kick him in the nuts because then it would have been ok if Beckham shanked him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ThinkAboutIt said:

Beckham on Cam and Norman before the game:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-gameday/0ap3000000604830/Beckham-I-m-excited-to-see-Cam-play

Like I said in the other thread, I don't mind the fact that Norman wanted to get into Beckham's head, in fact, I think CBs should do that (within certain boundaries, of course), but the fact remains, Norman "started it" when he picked up Beckham and slammed him during the Giants' first possession, and you could tell Beckham was surprised by it. 

Doesn't change the fact that he lost it, but he clearly didn't enter the game planning to leave it hating Norman. 

Beckham would've been a Panther if he could've chosen. 

Lord have mercy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was simply a case of two emotional and competitive players who got carried away.  The refs should have put a stop to it early.  They should have started throwing flags from the get go since everyone and their brother could see where this was heading.  And when the chippiness continued, they should have warned both coaches that the next time one of them did something, they were out of the game.  Then when it continued, Beckham should have been tossed since he was clearly the instigator.  But the refs instead sat on their hands and things got way out of control.

The biggest problem though was the spearing of Norman by Beckham.  The rest could be chalked up to over aggressiveness and too much emotion.  But what Beckham did was to intentionally try and hurt Norman.  A hit like that could have ended Josh's season, or even his career if he connected solidly enough.  It wasn't simply a football fight, it was an assault with intent to do bodily harm.  There is no place for that anywhere in football.  The fact the refs did not eject Beckham from the game is inexcusable, and the fact that Coughlin didn't pull him was just as inexcusable.  Josh was retaliating, but at no point was he trying to permanently injure Beckham.  There is a big difference in what each player did.

Josh will be fined, but Beckham should be suspended as well as being fined.  Hopefully his status as a "superstar" won't influence the NFL to allow him to play when his actions clearly warrant a suspension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ThinkAboutIt said:

I'm calling them both out, or maybe you failed reading comprehension. 

It's pretty clear you are citing Norman as the primary instigator.  I get it, it takes two to tango, however Josh is absolved from his reactions when he's putting up with that kind of poo from a psycho diva wr with intent of injury.  

Look at your thread title dude, and don't cry when people disagree with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Chaos said:

It's pretty clear you are citing Norman as the primary instigator.  I get it, it takes two to tango, however Josh is absolved from his reactions when he's putting up with that kind of poo from a psycho diva wr with intent of injury.  

Look at your thread title dude, and don't cry when people disagree with you.

If your definition of "pretty clear" is "what [you] want to be the case," then believe as you wish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, ThinkAboutIt said:

Beckham on Cam and Norman before the game:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-gameday/0ap3000000604830/Beckham-I-m-excited-to-see-Cam-play

Like I said in the other thread, I don't mind the fact that Norman wanted to get into Beckham's head, in fact, I think CBs should do that (within certain boundaries, of course), but the fact remains, Norman "started it" when he picked up Beckham and slammed him during the Giants' first possession, and you could tell Beckham was surprised by it. 

Doesn't change the fact that he lost it, but he clearly didn't enter the game planning to leave it hating Norman. 

Beckham would've been a Panther if he could've chosen. 

Even before what you call a slam, Beckham appears to stick his left hand up into Josh's face> This is just prior to the "slam".

 

Untitled.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sasquatch said:

Even before what you call a slam, Beckham appears to stick his left hand up into Josh's face> This is just prior to the "slam".

 

Untitled.png

Talk is talk.

Slamming is more excessive than talking.

P.S. I'm sure that wasn't the first word either of them had exchanged on that possession.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, ThinkAboutIt said:

Talk is talk.

Slamming is more excessive than talking.

P.S. I'm sure that wasn't the first word either of them had exchanged on that possession.

Beckham was sticking his hand in Norman's face repeatedly. They showed that during the game. People defend him saying Norman slammed him first. This screen capture was prior to the slam. Beckham already had his hand in Norman's face. The "slam" likely was not a response to talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Norman may have started it, but Beckham crossed a line with that helmet-to-helmet hit. Willie McGuinness said security would have had to escort him off the field if someone did that to him. The fact that Norman didn't go totally ape-poo in response to that is amazing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You and I both know there isn't a coach we could or can still hire that can "fix" Bryce Young. Even at mighty Alabama with one of the best modern coaches in college football history Mac Jones was still a better QB than Bryce Young. Mac Jones.... We already know how you feel about Canales on a personal level so in that regard you wanting him fired is not news. You don't have to disguise it behind this shroud of rabble about not fixing Bryce Young. To his credit he somehow had us competive against the Chiefs and the Eagles on the road with #9. But no coaching staff can overcome their starting QB turning the ball over 4 times. We definitely have developed some of our younger offensive pieces. And as far as Evero goes he has earned criticism and if he's fired so be it but in his defense many of us said in the offseason this defensive roster was a disaster waiting to happen given the resources we spent on the offense while neglecting the defense. That was Dan Morgan's plan. He swung too hard toward offense to salvage the Bryce Young trade. That's on him. We can scream about XL all we want but at least he's actually been on the field for the most part. The Brooks pick was a luxury pick at the time and now it is a Hurney level blunder. Dan Morgan has gotten a lot of early praise here when in reality he's unequivocally deserving of significant criticism. But if you say that some people get up in arms because he's a former Panther. Big whoop. He has just as much to prove this upcoming season as Canales. That's why to me in my own personal opinion I say one more season and then if it's more of the same say goodbye to both.
    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
×
×
  • Create New...