Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Down a corner.....Getts next move


Jmac

Recommended Posts

Cary Williams seems like an obvious choice, he's at the right age (30) to be both experienced and not that much over the hill. He has starting experience, SuperBowl experience and could probably slot in pretty quickly with 3 weeks of on-the-field training with Kurt Coleman helping over top

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bozarden said:

Would rather pull Ras-I-Dowling up from the PS than pay Cary williams. He was arguably the worst CB in the league with the Seahawks. 

From what I read his strength lies in playing zone defense and not what seattle was doing.. let's face it the entire seattle secondary sucks this year not just him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Toolbox said:

From what I read his strength lies in playing zone defense and not what seattle was doing.. let's face it the entire seattle secondary sucks this year not just him.

Seattle plays a lot of zone...

And yes they are bad in the secondary this year, but they already paid him his money, why cut him mid-season if he wasn't horrible? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bozarden said:

Seattle plays a lot of zone...

And yes they are bad in the secondary this year, but they already paid him his money, why cut him mid-season if he wasn't horrible? 

Well probably because seattle has done this before with percy havin who also had a huge contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...