Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Among Fans. Cam has a huge lead


DaveThePanther2008

Recommended Posts

On December 12, 2015 at 8:26 AM, fanattic said:

Cam deserves any accolades he can acquire. He's been great for the Panthers. Your hearing this from a Falcon fan.

I know quite a few Falcons fans from my travels in GA  that are quite engaging and respectful even though there is a huge rivalry between the teams.  I was surprised because a lot of them are also SEC UGA and Alabama alumni. All dislike Cam as a rival but very respectful and complimentary regarding his talents and accomplishments. 

Its a a total contrast to what we usually see on the Interweb. Here's to an injury free afternoon of football. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Totally agree.  Could you imagine if KB was in the mix.  This offense could be unstoppable.

IMO, in a round about way, not having KB has helped Cam tremendously With regards to development. He is actually going through his progressions, looking safetys off, and becoming a better pocket passer. I believe it is because he doesnt have the crutch that KB and #89 were earlier in his career. He used to just force that poo in there no matter what. very few  2nd or 3rd reads.

 

Now when he comes back next year, it is on like donkey kong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
    • I’m hoping SMU messes it all up and wins out. Imagine the SEC & BI0 would crap themselves trying to “fix” the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...