Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

visiting the salt mines of south louisiana


PhillyB

Recommended Posts

my god are they pissy over at saints report. everyone wants brandon browner executed at dawn and they have threads with titles like "throw the towel in toss the babby out with the bathwater" and "too many dumb players" and furious rants about officiating (which conveniently ignore flagrant hit-to-the-helmet/facemasks and a gifted fumble-six.)

but the best one is a thread entitled "thank you michael mauti" which got the equivalent of 90 pie. in the torrid silence of a crushing defeat the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade. harvest that salt saints fans, it's not like your sodium intake isn't already prodding the edges of the national health spectrum.

 

5665d9807215a_ScreenShot2015-12-07at2.04

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The hit on Cam was legal.

No one said it wasn't.....just that your worthless fans like to celebrate trying to hurt another player.  Oh wait....that is was your franchise will forever be known for.

You took your best shot on him....just to watch him get up and proceed to rape your team with no lube.

Go back to the bayou you swamprat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

No one said it wasn't.....just that your worthless fans like to celebrate trying to hurt another player.  Oh wait....that is was your franchise will forever be known for.

You took your best shot on him....just to watch him get up and proceed to rape your team with no lube.

Go back to the bayou you swamprat.

He clearly said, in the op, "the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade". That's why I commented that it was legal. Maybe pay attention to the above post before attacking me? 

He was trying to hurt Cam? Was Davis trying to hurt Drew? Come on man. Cam even said he deserved the hit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, saints4lifeagain said:

He clearly said, in the op, "the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade". That's why I commented that it was legal. Maybe pay attention to the above post before attacking me? 

He was trying to hurt Cam? Was Davis trying to hurt Drew? Come on man. Cam even said he deserved the hit. 

I was talking about the posters on your shithouse of a message board trying to celebrate a helmet to helmet hit on another team's QB....would not expect anything else from a Saints fan though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, PhillyB said:

in the torrid silence of a crushing defeat the only thing they could find solace in was an illegal hit on the greatest quarterback of this decade. 

 

10 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

The hit on Cam was legal.

 

7 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

No one said it wasn't.....

I'm so confused...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

 

 

I'm so confused...

well, you are a saints fan, so that is par for the course.

We should be discussing the disgusting Saints fans celebrating the possible injury of a player....and all you want to focus on is that someone thinks it was an illegal hit.

Guess you also think Bounty Gate never really happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helmet to helmet contact is legal on a runner. Cam was clearly a runner at the point of contact and honestly its Cam's fault he took the shot by not being fully aware of the field of play. You can watch his face from the replay and see him looking towards the middle of the field and doesn't notice the linebacker till right before he gets hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Considering the fact that the defender came around from near the middle of the end zone just to lead with his helmet against our franchise quarterback kind of makes that a fairly borderline play that looks a bit like head hunting. Who knows his intent though.

Regardless, the Saints lost. No pity here, they damn sure wouldn't be showing any for us if the outcome were different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MadHatter said:

well, you are a saints fan, so that is par for the course.

We should be discussing the disgusting Saints fans celebrating the possible injury of a player....and all you want to focus on is that someone thinks it was an illegal hit.

Guess you also think Bounty Gate never really happened.

Yeah. My intelligence is low because I'm a Saints fan. Yet, you're the one who looks like the moron in this thread.

But, I digress.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's a decent vid with compelling reasons for his opinion. But, my thing is is that you simply can't draft McMillan thinking he is a surefire WR1. There are questions. His 40---rightly or wrongly---will play a part. I'd think that his splits (which will speak more to his game translating to the pros in my mind) are more important.  As much as you're trying to sell us that McMillan is a don't-overthink-it-type-of-player, I wouldn't say that's the case. Workouts will play a part in all of this.  At this point, I like the thought of Tetairoa. That's as much as I can give you right now.
    • If Canales has helped Bryce a “poo ton” and this is what we have then what’s the fuging point? And the offense wasn’t humming with Dalton in there either, except against the raiders who’ll likely be firing their coach after this season.  XL is probably the fourth best looking receiving option on the team right now behind thielen, Coker, and sanders. I don’t think anyone would disagree with that. Who cares about total receiving yards when everyone else has missed time and there’s like 180 yards of receiving a game to go around   and lmao they were “believing” shut the fug up. They lost and for the most part those games were all the defense shutting down the other team. The chiefs turned around and gave up an actual impressive stat line to Aiden O’Connell and I not even the most delusional raiders fans think that means anything. Bryce did nothing against the eagles, the Bucs are a mash unit, and any one of us could have done that Bryce did against the giants and saints.  And as far as who they’d get, they didn’t have any trouble hiring the guy you’re tripping over yourself to defend. They also could have hired Dan Quinn, who’s actually succeeding with a young qb.  And people are acting like the risk of getting paid for not working for five years is a negative. Canales is going to spend the next half a decade getting paid to watch porn in his Bible camp office.
    • the Dallas game definitely quelled the hype. his biggest issue will always be his size, and that shows when he gets sacked. he's simply not big or strong enough to protect the ball. even in the KC game, he fumbled it on a basic sack and thank god icky landed on it. INT's are going to happen, most fans don't understand that tipped balls and wrong routes account for most interceptions. but the wet-bar-of-soap type fumbles upon contact are a huge reg flag. the common theme with players like Darnold and Mayfield who previously played for us and are now excelling makes me want to practice patience more when it comes to the QB position. I think Bryce bought himself another season, perhaps with more weapons. I do like the idea of adding a QB whether that's a FA or mid round rookie. if the same mistakes occur next season and we see no further growth or most importantly, wins, then it will be time to move on. just a quick reminder though, football is not an individual sport. QB is just one position, albeit the most important. 
×
×
  • Create New...